One of the way is by probing the University’s system without being notice. By doing this, the attacker might be able to find a back door that will grant him access to his objective. The attacker will try to find the range of the University’s IP address. He will look for routing information, and mail servers. He will be using WHOIS and Domain Name System (DNS).
According to Aaron (2007) in the The Little, Brown Compact Handbook, the word “plagiarism” is derived from a Latin word meaning to kidnap or to abduct (p. 424). Plagiarism is stealing someone else’s work and passing it off as one’s own. In many other cultures, plagiarizing is encouraged because it demonstrates familiarity and respect for the work of noted writers. However, in the United States and at Columbia Southern University, plagiarism is considered fraud and can have serious consequences. Plagiarism usually comes in two forms: intentional and unintentional.
University of Phoenix Material BUGusa, Inc., Worksheet Use the scenarios in the Bugusa, Inc., link located on the student website to answer the following questions. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc., Advertisement Has WIRETIME, Inc., committed any torts? If so, explain. WIRETIME, Inc. has committed a defamation tort. They are affecting BUGusa, Inc.'s reputation by making statements about them that may be false.
The Danger of Stereotyping Many concerns have been raised about the relationship link between gender, and societal pressures to terrorism. Authors, Michael S. Kimmel, a professor of sociology at the State University of New York at Stony Brook, and Noel Sturgeon, a professor of women’s studies and American studies at Washington State University, use different circumstances and examples to discuss this relationship, its validity, and which societal pressures are causing such anomalies to occur ( Kimmel 646, Sturgeon 574). Throughout each piece of academic writing, rhetorical strategies are used to boost the author’s points. Although their arguments are solid with valid points, the authors do have holes in their essays that I disagree with. The
The Old Dominion University (ODU) Undergraduate Catalogue (2010-2011, p.15) defines plagiarism as follows: Intentionally or knowingly representing the words or ideas of another as one’s own without properly acknowledging their source. Examples of plagiarism include, but are not limited to, the following: submitting a research paper obtained from a commercial research service, the Internet, or from another student as if it were original work; making simple changes to borrowed materials while leaving the organization, content, or phraseology intact; or coping material from a source, supplying proper documentation, but leaving out quotation marks. Plagiarism also occurs in a group project if one or more of the members of the group does none of the group’s work and participates in none of the group’s activities, but attempts to take credit for the work of the group. Hints for Avoiding Plagiarism: • More than three words is plagiarism. This is a good yardstick to use when wondering whether or not quotes are appropriate.
Is Google really making us stupid? Nicholas Carr, a technology writer poses that question about the internet and asks readers to give it some thought. He makes suggestions that the internet is changing the way our mind works and that it has negative consequences on the mind. Carr believes that we should be skeptical of the internet because of the adverse ways it may be shaping the way we think. Thinking critically about his article, I can find some patterns in his writing, such as fact and fiction, presenting evidence with an argument, cause and effect, and tonal qualities.
The Language Police Throughout “The Language Police,” the angered author, Diane Ravitch, speaks her mind on the issue of censorship. Censorship shelters students from the real world and gives them a false sense of reality. Ravitch believes that students are being censored to such an extreme that their freedom is being limited. The goal of the language police is not just to stop us from using objectionable words but to stop us from having objectionable thoughts (Ravitch 158). The language police are restricting what students learn by removing anything that may appear controversial.
Academic dishonesty is the participation or collaboration in specific prohibited forms of conduct.” Academic dishonesty includes the following: * Registering for a course not approved by a student advisor; * Unauthorized copying, collaboration, or use of notes, books, or other materials on examinations or other academic exercises; * Plagiarism, which is defined as the intentional representation of another person’s work, words, thoughts, or ideas, including material from the Internet as one’s own; * Unauthorized possession of any academic material, such as tests, research papers, assignments, or similar materials; or * Furnishing false information with the intent to deceive members of the college faculty or administration who are acting in the exercise of their official duties. Please consult the catalog for information on penalties for violation of the Academic Honesty policy. Please note that as the Catalog and Student Handbook is updated, campus policies may
Delibrate plagiarism on any assignment, major or minor, will result in a grade of F for the course. It is important to understand that in academic and professional life, plagiarism is completely unacceptable. “Hunter College regards acts of academic dishonesty (e.g. plagiarism, cheating on examinations, obtaining unfair advantage,and falsification of records and official documents) as serious offenses against the values of intellectual honesty. The college is committed to enforcing the CUNY Policy on Academic Integrity and will pursue cases of academic dishonesty according to the Hunter College Integrity Procedures.” COURSE OUTLINE WEEK ONE Thursday, August 27th Course introduction/Syllabus/English 120 Student Information and Record Sheet.
Are there legal steps that a college must take, should take, should not take, or may not take in addressing cyber bullying? May or should a college block access to a Web site that contains offensive content? May or should a college discipline a harasser through the judicial or conduct process? What legal and administrative options exist for students who are harassed or defamed on the Web? What, if anything, is the College’s educational role in addressing cyber bullying?