Hacibey Catalbasoglu Mrs. Joanne Knight AP Language and Composition April 24, 2014 “Polling and its Authenticity” Polling has become an integral part of the United States election process. The media, as well as the voting population, take into great consideration the results of various political polls. But are these polls inaccurate? Has the United States been relying on the inaccurate data of public polling? The answer is, yes.
As a result, the deeper biases reflected in sensationalism often leave citizens confused about issues which forces them to deconstruct this alternately managed and frenzied news in order to make sound judgements about their society and government. Without question, money necessitates an effective campaign and election, and a lot of it. The amount of money that can be raised and spent dominates and facilitates campaigns and elections. Affirmative advantages of possessing an abundance of money can enable an otherwise unknown candidate heard and seen. Money buys name recognition and organizational support, hence the reason that so much money is spent by candidates and their parties on media related campaigning.
Even though it might seems as a small problem, comparing to all other troubles that the nation has experienced, nonetheless it must be addressed in a timely matter because any delay in making the decision will make the issue even more severe. It might cause people’s choice of government to become much skewed. If some area has a majority of supporters for a certain party and the conditions for them to vote are beneficial, the community will be able to include all their votes, and comparing to a place that has supporters of the opposite party but has no opportunity to vote. The candidate for the election will lose that majority of votes and people will be faced with the government that only minority wanted to see in
One example would be that it is used by politicians to inform people about social issues, as Best explains in chapter one. This is why they are so important. Due to the fact that if they are not used the right way they can really affect how things are believed to be and what people might do because of them. Threw out the book Best explains different things that cause deformations in statistics. They round up from the simple fact that people usually change the meaning of them due to the fact that they simply don’t understand it.
In other words, elections are usually dependent on what the people see and not what they hear. For instance, in Source C, it states, “Our national politics has become a competition for images or between images, rather than between ideals.” This quote explains that politics is more based on a candidate’s image rather then what they support. Pursuing this further, Theodore H. White in Source C says, “Nixon’s---light-colored suit, wrong makeup, bad posture--- was ‘fuzzed’.” This is a direct example of how an election can depend on a person’s characteristics. Nixon, having a bad representation of him-self, caused people to favor him less whether or not he had strong ideals that they agree with. To sum up, television causes people to approve the candidate’s that give more pleasure to the eye than those that give better
So one interesting possibility for Electoral College reform is to educate the voters more clearly and involve them in the process earlier on. While the theory of this is good, it would be difficult to implement since much of the voting population currently feels disenfranchised. This proposal also does note address the problems of two-party
Assess the significance of region, race and religion as factors explaining voting behaviour in the USA. Voting behaviour has absorbed a great deal of the time of both political parties in America. Much effort has been put into analysing voting behaviour and patterns in previous elections - be they national, state or local elections etc. - in an effort to predict their own voter base and those social groups they could concentrate their efforts on and those groups that would appear to be a lost cause and therefore a waste of time in terms of money spent and time invested in targeting as potential voters. Any comment about a social, religious or minority group can only be generalised when referring to its voting habits and so the following comments can only be taken as a generalisation.
The Real Reason The intended audience is people who believe the reasoning for proposed legislation for voters to use government issued picture identification is misdirected actions by Republicans to keep likely Democrat voters from casting their ballots. The electoral system as we know it is flawed. It has been for years, perhaps even going as far back as its initial inception. Some of the biggest headlines that top news and media are those of voting fraud. These faults can be placed on all party lines.
It is in fact possible to identify three different behaviours of the voters. Sincere voters cast their ballot for their most preferred party or candidate, not considering its chances to actually win the election (or a seat at least). Sophisticated ones base their votes on the expected utility according to a party or a candidate and its probability of success. Sophisticated voters usually pay attention to previous elections and surveys. The third type of voters is the one voting for the frontrunner, according to previous elections or polls.
Some pay more attention than others, but they all have to consider the views of the folks back home. Congress is also organized primarily along party lines, so party membership is an important determinant of a member’s vote. Each party develops its own versions of many important bills, and party leaders actively pressure members to vote according to party views. It is not surprising that representatives and senators vote along party lines about three-fourths of the time. Finally, what if a representative or senator seriously disagrees with the views of his or her constituents on a particular issue?