With him being the only one who disagreed I believed it was to be assumed that he would be the one to emerge as the leader. I will briefly describe the process of elimination in the movie took place and state the styles that were used. At first juror#1 attempted to lead the group by trying to maintain authority and organizing how the discussion was going to go, you could easily see how frustrated he became with the rest of the group. With that said juror #1 is eliminated. Juror#2 also was eliminated although he was a very positive character with an open mind, he did not have much confidence.
The molding of the men of Police Battalion 101 from ordinary men to ruthless killers is likened to the molding of the prison guards from ordinary men to sadistic authorities. The use of this experiment becomes especially relevant when considering the similarities between the compositions of the participants analyzed. In Zimbardo’s experiment, the twenty-four selected were predominantly white middle-class males and thus relatively “ordinary”. In Browning’s study, the Police Battalion 101 also fit this “ordinary” niche, which when considering their ages, class, origins, and motives, no indication that these men would become mass murderers was made present. They were ‘middle-aged family men of the working-class”(1), implying that they had been exposed to alternative worldviews because they had been socialized before the Nazis came to power and as the working-class, were one of the groups least inclined to support the Nazis.
Juror four was one of the many jurors to watch the presentation Juror eight made about the old man and how long it would take him to get from his bedroom to the hallway. He was convinced the boy wasn’t guilty. Juror four represented the best of our American justice system because he was intelligent, fair, and concerned with facts. Juror four sided with Juror eight, and tried to convince everyone else that the boy was not guilty. In the end, the whole jury decided the boy wasn’t guilty, there wasn’t enough evidence to prove other wise.
8th juror, an architect and father of two, is the only juror to vote 'not guilty' in the first instance. Amongst these twelve anonymous men, he is the first to really gain the audience's attention, willingly and publicly going against the majority of the group by voting 'not guilty' after all the others vote 'guilty' (p.7). In this early action, we can identify many important qualities of his character. He is willing to question the 'facts' with which he has been presented.. He has compassion for the accused.
Full gang members did not pay dues so the extortionary taxes were paid from other businesses that operated on the gang turf.In my opinion, the Black Gangster Disciple Organization run by J.T was very meticulous in its dealings. He kept an detailed accounts of the movement of the money that way being made , and apparently he treated all his crew members somewhat fairly being that there was no mention of any of his crew member being disloyal to him or the organization. I also feel that J.T. being a college graduate gives him a better advance of being a leader because his college major is business (P. 93). And before getting into the crack gang he held a job that cover marketing and which he had to use his business degree (P. 93).Due to him learning and understand the importance of making sure that he collects data he was always management strategies (P. 94).
Morris begins the film with a juxtaposition of introductory statements from both parties who were involved in the murder of officer Woods. In order to convince the audience that Adams is an innocent man and the distrust of Harris. The audience first sees and hears Adams, which immediately set the rest of the tone for the documentary. Adams begins talking about his first couple of days in Dallas, and how him an his brother were trying to get to California, “I’m not in town for half a day and I got the job.” The viewers acknowledge that Adams is a hard-working man, who has a bright future ahead of him. Which makes them think twice that a hard-working man is not capable of murder.
Ted was a normal child before he was mistreated by his family and the kids at school as well as when he went to college. Ted was a smart man. In one of Bundy’s court appearences he acted as his own lawyer. Ted was smart enough to excape from custody more than once. URL/ ISBN where you found your EVIDENCE http://www.crimemuseum.org/crime-library/ted-bundy Conclude your argument Summarize your opinion on your topic Ted was dangerous and harmful to society Summarize support “B” Ted was a criminal whose crimes cannot be forgiven Summarize support “C” Te had no remorse toward the women he
Holmes had high self-esteem we know this because he believed he would never get caught, and when he did he thought he could get off free. Although he admitted to killing 27 people the cops knew he had killed more which made Holmes believe he was great at what he did. Killing the people made Holmes feel powerful therefore his self-esteem raised dramatically. H.H. Holmes was Americas first documented serial killer, Holmes killed over 200 people but he only admitted to killing 27 of them.
Maycomb is a microcosm because throughout the story you are faced with prejudice white people. Tom Robinson is a innocent black man they convicted a of a crime he did not do, but it was okay because the they believed the white man over the black man. This was how it was in 1930’s in America. Maycomb symbolically represents the United States in the 1930’s because that is what everybody believed. This is how Harper Lee used the microcosm to develop her story.
And after every murder he would just think back about how the gentle man with gentle thoughts and struck. This feeling made him feel good, it gave him great strength in his own mind. As he would laugh at the authorities trying to hunt the offender down. But of course like all cases they must come to a close, the offender gets caught and just is served but no in jack the rippers case, he was never caught. Because Unlike today, with DNA evidence, and other forensic tools, made famous by current TV shows, there was little to go on except the 'gut instinct' of the police, testimony of witnesses, etc.