Why Did Stalin Take Over Eastern Europe?

470 Words2 Pages
WHY DID STALIN TAKE OVER EASTERN EUROPE? The stage was set for the communists to seize control of much of Eastern Europe by the ‘percentage agreement’ of October 1944. This was when Churchill agreed that Stalin should have predominance in Romania and Bulgaria. Greece should remain in the West and that power should be shared with the communists in Yugoslavia and Hungary. Stalin had many motives to claim increasingly more of Eastern Europe. The largest of them all being that during the over 25,000,000 Russians may have died, which is the largest casualty has received during war. Russia had been invaded by other countries, the most famous of them being Napoleon and then WWI and WWII. With all the Countries taken over by the Nazi’s the USSR decided to start liberating many of the Eastern European countries, turning them into Communist states. For the USSR this would mean large buffer zones before (another war) enemies get into mainland Russia. The larger area would also increase their world wide influence. This would make other countries think twice about waging war on such a big and powerful country. With the benefit of these larger areas more natural resources are available, such as wood and metals. It would also mean cheap workforce, i.e. because it’s a Communist State. This is vital if entering or being attacked upon during war. More money can go into investigating into better/stronger weapons. With the takeover of Eastern Europe and Communism spreading fast. Churchill and Truman had to start liberating as money countries as they could, as fast as they could. They succeeded. In the countries that the Red Army "liberated", communist-dominated governments took power. The Communists made sure that they controlled the army, set up a secret police force and began to arrest their opponents. Non-Communists were gradually beaten, murdered, executed and
Open Document