Voter Identification Essay

1553 Words7 Pages
Kelsey Anderson POLS 100 1pm MWF 17 September 2012 Internet Essay 1 Voter Identification means requiring a non-photo or photo identification to be able to receive a ballot for an election. A majority of states now have voter-ID laws, where it is a requirement to have an identification to be able to vote. There are many people that believe Republicans are pushing for these laws because the minorities, young voters and the poor will be affected. These groups are the ones that tend to vote for Democrats. Throughout the paper, articles will be discussed that many states are now requiring a form of photo-or non-photo identification. The first article I read was titled “Voting Rights (Registration and Requirements)”. It was in the New…show more content…
There are a few states, like the state of South Dakota, which do not have very strict rules on identification for voting. Since there are less strict rules in South Dakota, allows for voters to sign an affidavit. The affidavit is a verified statement that allows for people to vote. If people at the polls can identify you, that is another way of identification. Michigan, Louisiana, Hawaii, Florida, and Idaho are the other states that have less strict rules on voter identification. There are, however, a few states that have very strict ID laws they include: Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Georgia, and Kansas. These states only allow voters to vote if they have a certain type of photo identification to prove their…show more content…
Pam Fessler wrote about “Judge Wont Black Pennsylvania Voter ID Law”, on August 15, 2012. During the broadcast, they conversed that a Judge by the name of Robert Simpson had refused to block the voter ID law going into effect. Many people had believed that the law was going to hurt the poor, minorities, and the elderly who may not have identification. Pennsylvania is a state that will be important for the 2012 Presidential Election, but Simpson believed that the law was fair and reasonable. He thought that the state would not be hurt, if the law were to
Open Document