Ultimately, the Deaths of Romeo and Juliet Have More to Do with Their Own Actions, Than the Actions of Others. Do You Agree

831 Words4 Pages
Romeo and Juliet, written in the mid-1590’s by William Shakespeare, conveys the story of two fallen-in-love teenagers who defy their families’ long-standing feud and risk everything to be together which ultimately ends in their deaths. Although the deaths of Romeo and Juliet are to be blamed by the actions undertaken by them themselves, there are a number of other people who contributed, including the Montague house, the Capulet house and Friar Lawrence. Lord Montague is one person to blame mainly because of the feud between the Montague’s and the Capulet’s. If there was no family feud between them, they would have been able to tell people about their love. But because of the feud, it made them sneak around hiding it from both their parents, in fear they would get caught and never see one another again an example of this is when the prince says “See what a scourge is laid upon your hate” after both Romeo and Juliet kill themselves. Another reason it was Lord Montague’s fault was because he was not emotionally connected to his son. Evidence that supports this is when Romeo was off wondering off by himself because he was upset, Lord Montague wanted to know why and asks “Could we but learn from whence his sorrows grow” but instead of himself finding out for himself, he sends Benvolio to do it because he knows Romeo would not share with him because of the absence of connection between them. Also, if he knew his own son better, Lord Montague would have known that Romeo was hiding something and was sneaking around. But because they did not have a good relationship and communication between the two of them Lord Montague had no idea what was going through the head of Romeo until his unfortunate death. Lord Capulet is also to blame for the same reason as Lord Montague because of the feud they had. If there was no feud, then there would be no running around in fear of
Open Document