Trans Sahran Vs. Atlantic Slave Trade

815 Words4 Pages
The Atlantic slave trade and the Trans-Saharan slave trade gave off beneficial and harmful affects to the different Africans they encountered. Both slave trades affected African population. However, these slave trades differed in the way and length of slave transportation. The consumers of slaves in the Atlantic slave trade were European socies, while the buyers of slaves in the Trans-Saharan network were primarily Muslims in the Middle East. African societies were affected greatly by both the Atlantic and Trans-Saharan networks. Slavery existed in Africa long before the formation of these slave trading networks. The most common slaves were prisoners of war and sometimes criminals. Slaves were purchased by fellow Africans; they were greatly valued in African societies, because they were used to measure wealth. The slave trades benefited the African societies that had control over the slave trades, because they maintained the merchandise (slaves) in their possession. The demand for slaves in both the Atlantic slave trade and the Trans-Saharan slave trade was great. With the absence of labor in the Americas Europeans needed slaves to work on plantations. In the Atlantic slave trade, European exchange African slaves for horses, European manufactured goods, and superior weaponry. This gave certain African societies considerable advantages over rival tribes. Slaves were demanded in the Trans-Saharan network, because North African, Persian, and Arab merchants sought opportunities to resell slaves as field workers and domestic servants in Asia. The slaves captured and sold to foreigners generally lived harsh lives away from their families. When African slave suppliers ran out of slaves, chiefs organized raiding parties to seize individuals from neighboring tribes. Slave capturing was very violent, and many times wars were started for the purpose of capturing
Open Document