The Exorcist vs. the Exorcism of Emily Rose

679 Words3 Pages
“The Exorcist” Vs. “The Exorcism of Emily Rose” When comparing the films “The Exorcist” and “The Exorcism of Emily Rose” It must first be understood that the two films are in no way related other than the subject of exorcism. The Exorcist was a 1973 film directed by William Friedkin. It is a story about Regan MacNeil, the teenage daughter of actress Chris MacNeil, and her possession by a demonic spirit by the name of Pazuzu. The main focus of the film is the supernatural battle between priest, Father Damien Karras, and the demon spirit Pazuzu. Though the film is loosely based on actual events, it is a fictional story. The film is a horror classic with limited special effects designed to scare and haunt the viewer through the use of graphic images, dialogue, and intense acting. The Exorcism of Emily Rose was created in 2005 and directed by Scott Derrickson. It has two plots. The first is that of a priest, Father Richard Moore, on trial for negligent homicide, and the construction of his legal defense by his lawyer Erin Bruner. The second plot is the story of a woman, Emily Rose, and her supposed possession of the six demons; Cain, Nero, Judas, Legion, Belial, and Lucifer. The two plots of this story are intertwined through the use of flashbacks during the court proceedings portion of the film. This film uses limited special effects. It scares the viewer through the use of extremely intense acting and well thought dialogue. The two movies have a number of similarities in the plot. Both stories are possession stories of a young girl. They are both based, in some way, off of actual events. They are horror movies and both use limited special effects. The Exorcist as well as The Exorcism of Emily Rose show a portrayal of a Roman Catholic exorcism. Though there are some similarities between the two movies, there are significant differences
Open Document