At the beginning of Act 1 we are confronted with the physical conflict in the play when Abigail threatens her friends when they are crumbling and on the verge of spilling Abigail’s secret: “Let either of you breathe a word, or the edge of a word, about the other things, and I will come to you in the black of some terrible night and I will bring a pointy reckoning that will shudder you.” Power through violence is a main theme in this play. Whoever has power will enforce it viciously to ensure their needs are secured. For example, Tituba, Reverend Paris’ slave faces certain death by beating or confess to witchcraft. This outcome suits Paris’s needs, in order to hold responsible someone outside of his immediate family for witchcraft. Physical conflict is at the heart of the play through the witch hunt; a constant threat to all of the main characters integrity, constantly being scrutinised by a suspicious community on the road to utter destruction.
The use of blame is usually a selfish man’s burden, but is sometimes justifiable in the effect of fear. In author Miller’s The Crucible, the characters’ use of blame is wrong and unjustifiable in every way. Abigail and the other girls’ actions of blaming cause the unrighteous demise of the innocent in Salem. Her actions are selfish and the other girls blame in fear of her. Abigail’s self-centered doings created a chain reaction that altered the whole village and its future.
Macbeth Essay Macbeth by William Shakespeare is a play, which highlights individual’s thirst for power and the unethical paths many take to achieve their goals. The final scenes draw the dramatic tale to a close and cease the constant stream of murders. The audience observes the re-establishment of themes within the final scenes such as guilt, restoration of harmony, and good defeating evil. These along with significant events change the mood of the play consequently altering responders’ overall interpretation. Guilt is constantly seen throughout the play Macbeth driving the characters to question their morals.
(200) For Hobbes, the people living in the “state of nature,” which is a mental construct, experience a vivid fear of one another because of the prevailing anarchic condition. This paper shows how the mechanism of fear leads to the advent of the state, which basically resumes Hobbes’s political thought. The first part, which describes the Hobbesian view of human nature, serves as the basis for the second part which spells out the creation of the state out of the fear of mutual destruction. Pessimistic view of human nature Hobbes has a very pessimistic view of human nature as displayed in Leviathan. He considers the individual living in the state of nature as asocial.
The Madness in King Lear In the play, King Lear, the word “mad” is located throughout the play having many different meanings like anger, insanity, violence and infatuation. King Lear is greatly known in portraying this word to his character, but each time mad is being used, it has a different meaning. Not only can mad be used as other adjectives but, mad can also be used as foreshadowing: “I have full cause of weeping, but this heart Shall break into a hundred thousand flaws, Or ere I’ll weep.—O Fool, I shall go mad!”(Lear. Act II, Scene 4) King Lear is literally upset and he starts to weep. In this scene, a storm appears as foreshadowing.
The descriptive label given to Macbeth is very deserving. It is to be notified that Macbeth’s evil intentions arose very early in the play as he contemplated the murder of King Duncan. This thought is seen in Act 1, scene 4 as Macbeth says, “My thought, whose murder yet is but fantastical, shakes so my single state of man that function is smothered in surmise, and nothing is but what it is not. Macbeth continually developed unworthy thoughts as he drifted from an impressive and an ambitious warrior to an unjust and overly ambitious ruler. Many may argue that this title given to Macbeth seems very harsh and many may use examples such as in Act 1, scene 4 for justification of his feelings of trepidation.” The prince of Cumberland!
Othello is a quintessential tragedy about humanity and the examination of human frailty. The fundamental ideology about this tragedy is that human frailties are exposed and emphasized when an individual is caught between worlds. The structure of the play, use of binary opposites and the dramatic irony all contribute to the fall from grace and inevitable death of a hero. Our play needs to consider the flaws and weaknesses of humans and the frailty of those who bear insecurities and most importantly, why individuals have insecurities. Is it the characterization of Othello being the outsider, or is it the self-inadequacies felt by Iago, or possibly the silencing of the women?
Shakespeare presents the feud between the two families as unnecessary, wasteful and it is the cause of death for many characters but without this hatred the final uniting of the two families could no have been possible. The fight is seen to be “a plague o’ both [the] houses…[and] they have made worms’ meat of”(A3, S1, L107-109) many of the characters. The Montague and Capulet’s hatred also affected the play’s final outcome because of the consequence behind their hateful actions. The grief that comes with loss, Romeo’s banishment and other events that take place all present the fact that “all are punished” (A5, S3, L294) for the violence. The hatred between the Montagues and Capulets also led to their love being forbidden, if the two families were not enemies than the death of Romeo and Juliet would never have taken place but in the end their death ultimately brought the families together.
Moral Dilemma in Relationships: Have you ever faced a situation in which you feel obliged to take two or more actions (at a time), but then realized that it would not be possible? Moral philosophy/ethics refer to such situations as “moral dilemmas”. Moral dilemmas distinguish themselves from other forms of dilemma in that the agent feels obliged to execute each of two or more actions; the agent is capable of executing each of those actions; but he cannot carry out both (or more) of the actions (Rachels & Rachels, 2006). Consequently, the agent risks moral failure no matter what he does. For instance, the Bible, and indeed the society encourage people to love their neighbors.
It is demonstrated that many individuals, in seeking to associate with a community, may be forced to sacrifice their personal identity. Alternatively, it is shown that for some individuals this cost may be too high, leading them to disassociate themselves from their society. Miller’s The Crucible depicts the struggle for individuals to maintain their personal identity within an environment that necessitates belonging to a group. The harsh landscape of Salem has provoked the development of a community where in order to survive, it is essential to belong. The Virgin Forest is described with the religious metaphor of “the Devil’s last preserve”, evoking a sense of fear and providing a motivator for involuntary adherence to group ideology.