Systematic Research Review Paper

1700 Words7 Pages
Systematic Research Review Rebecca Harty Chamberlain College of Nursing NR505: Advance Research Methods: Evidence-Based Learning Spring A, 2015 Introduction Before a patient may present with Cardiopulmonary arrest, they will often exhibit signs and symptoms of their worsening condition hours or days prior to the event. This is considered “failure to rescue” where the caregivers lack the skill to identify signs and symptoms of a decline in a patient’s condition, or a delay in intervening to prevent a cardiac arrest. Failure to rescue.is used as a measure of the overall performance of a hospital though some feel its an act wrongdoing, or negligence. Cardiopulmonary arrests have up to a mortality rate of 80% (Winters et al., 2013). Often,…show more content…
The articles were confined to studies that implemented RRT (rapid-response team), critical care outreach team model, MET, used a comparison group, and were published after 2008 (Winters et al., 2013). Reviews involved were quantitative, and qualitative. Being adapted by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the depth of evidence was done using the Evaluation Working Group criteria, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, and Development. Two reviewers viewed 2,560 articles, of which only 43 met inclusion criteria. Twenty-six of the articles were reviewed for usefulness, and seventeen reviewed for implementation. Key effectiveness outcomes included variable of adult and non-ICU pediatric Cardiopulmonary arrest, along with adult and pediatric hospital mortality (Winters et al., 2013). Research of RRS could be quantitative or qualitative. Language, or country were not factors in this systemic review. A calculated estimate risk ratio, the associated SE, and its logarithm were taken from each study (Winters et al., 2013). Only one review was considered high quality out of 7 systematic reviews of RRS, which scored 10 out of 11 for criteria. Accurate high quality systematic reviews define the development of findings that are bias free. The assessor rates the studies on the basis of if they modified for those who where confused, and for…show more content…
Assessing the effect of a modification in the RRS agenda, seven of the studies used a qualitative approach, and eleven used quantitative methods (Winters et al., 2013). There are pros and cons for both types of studies. The main design of the research used in this systematic review was quantitative research. Quantitative research often produces information that is geared toward a larger population. The information is easily translated into simple charts and graphs due to the fact the information provided are in statistical number form (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2011). Not having a large enough sample is a imitation to quantitative research. Before the study is started, large samples are required for quantitative studies. Validity, accuracy, and projectability all can be affected by the misuse of sampling, which can also limit the research. Another limitation was not having enough give, which can cause statistical error because the research has short interviews (Winters et al.,
Open Document