With this way, the self-interest ambition of one branch will counter the ambition of other branches just like James Madison wrote in federalist no. 51 that “Ambition…be made to counteract ambition”. And basing upon on the pluralist theory that the power in society is distributed among those interest group that compete with one another to take control of public policy. One more time, the Constitution has the control to limit these groups to avoid violence and aggression cause by these factions. Therefore, by using majoritarian principle and pluralist theory, James Madison affirmed that Republican has the power to control the faction’s effect better than
Locke’s text describes how every man has the same rights to one another. If one man can have control over something or someone else, then, by the law of nature, every other man should have the same rights of power. According to Locke, men should not feel powerless under the legislative law. In understanding this, a man, whether under law or not, should not feel like they are under someone else’s will. One of the most important topics Locke wanted to encourage, was that people have control over the government, setting limited power for a temporary time, and in having this, the people can demolish the form of government if the government does not comply to the people’s needs “the people have a right to act as supreme, and continue the legislative in themselves” (Locke).
He also desired equality and justice for all regardless of their religious or political affiliation but not through a government that had complete control over its people like an aristocrat would over “commoners.” Equality and protection of all citizens should be granted and protected by the government of America; a government elected by the people and for the people. Both men desired the government to have the common interest of the people at its cores, but had different ways of achieving it. Unlike Washington, who favored a centralized government, Jefferson opposed it. This created a conflict because Jefferson feared that the ideology of republicanism was threatened with a centralized and powerful government proposed by Washington as well as the supposed monarchical tendencies of Hamilton and the
To me it should keep a court system and provide national military and local police forces, but no more. It should not play the role of distributing wealth or dictating the private decisions of its citizens. If the powers of government were truly followed by the constitution we would all be better off. I am going to incorporate more thinking about what I do and about the laws I must follow after reading this. I want to be successful and life and I do not want the government holding me back from living my life the way it is supposed to be lived.
Judges need more discretionary power, as imprisonment is not effective in rehabilitating all offenders. Parliaments should have less influence on the administration of justice. Politicians are wholly concerned with winning votes and decisions they make might be popular with the majority of society but they can be detrimental to the process of rehabilitating offenders, and reducing chances of future recidivism. The legislature should be able to pass laws against any act or omission of duty that results in harm to society but leave the interpretation and application of those laws to judiciary, which is concurrent with the Separation of Powers Doctrine. Judges should be able employ other methods if they feel that they will be more successful.
If the Supreme Court judges were to be elected and corrupted by the public then nothing about them would be “supreme”. These elite people are where they are because of their morals and value. The precise reason as to why they have been appointed rather than made run an election. The Supreme Court Justices are not chosen by the people of America but by the President of the United States. Our founding fathers knew what kind of world this world was going to become and therefore made this decision to protect the well being of our
Congress: He supported the idea a new constitution (one that followed the New Jersey Plan) to be signed into law. He was so against the idea of some states not having as much rights as others that he threatened to make alliances with other countries to insure the small states were cared for. As the convention went on Bedford became more flexible and was in the committee that drafted the Great Compromise, which he supported. Voting Rights: Bedford cared more about states right than voting rights of individuals in the convention. Legislative wise, he supported the New Jersey Plan where each state would have the same amount of representatives in congress regardless of their size, thus giving all states an equal vote.
For this not to happen, a combination of oligarchy and democracy should be formed. The Founding Fathers favored representative democracy. They favored this form of government because it minimized the risk of abuse of power. They believed that the phrase "will of the people" was not
Whitman wroted that the governments role was to be "... not of an officious intermeddler in the affairs of men, but of a prudent watchman who prevents outrage," that is strengthened by his underlying logic that "... although government can do little positive good to the people, it may do an immense deal of harm." (Whitman) Simply put, if the governemnt has less has to do with meddling in peoples affairs and rights then society will be better off. Also that the role of the government is to act as a protector of smaller groups and individuals from bigger groups so everyone will be happy. The basis of laissez-faire is that the bigger the government factor, being it’s rights and powers, the worse of the country is. William Graham Sumner was another supporter of the laissez-faire idea.
Each branch has its own powers in the government, but the system of checks and balances keeps each branch from gaining too much power and overstepping its bounds. The checks and balances were originally put in place to protect the newly formed democracy from turning into another monarchy. Though stalemates do occur, for the most part, the three branches work together to promote the will of the people. Stalemates are bound to happen with differing opinions. When the executive branch is made of a majority of one party and the legislative branch is made up of a majority of a different party.