Spiral Curriculum

1113 Words5 Pages
This chapter gives an overview of the previous studies conducted which were deemed to be significantly associated with this research pursuit. According to T. Lizer (2013), it was revealed from her study that the impact of curriculum change in teaching and learning of science subjects that teachers feel that it is not necessary for them to change the way they teach, especially those who did not receive training on the new curriculum changes during their tertiary education. The findings from her study also indicate that lack of resources impact negatively on the implementation of curriculum reform in teaching and learning of science in many under-resourced schools in rural areas. The findings also reveal that, it is not easy for subject advisors…show more content…
Wiley (2015), it was revealed that understanding the spiral curriculum worked enhanced with time, with the benefit of the spiral curriculum being felt more conclusively in the latter years, and the majority of students not being confused by the spiral curriculum. In connection with their perceptions to spiral curriculum as needed for successful learning, the finding shows that those students who were most confused by the spiral curriculum were the ones who were least likely to appreciate its benefits. It was also revealed that there was a perceived predominant advantage which is the opportunity for consolidation of previously visited knowledge, with re-visitation of the topics has helped to understand and learn more thoroughly. In order to prevent information overload there must be clarity on the depth of knowledge at each stage. A spiral curriculum must spiral and not be a repetition of previously delivered…show more content…
J. A. Resurreccion and J. Adanza recommended that since science teachers were still adapting to the new curriculum, they needed more time and trainings to master all the fields and to learn new teaching strategies because it is difficult to teach something, in which one does not have the necessary mastery. They can teach other branches of science without the in-depth discussion because it is not their specialization. In the study of A. Argote (2016), results show that in describing and understanding the lived experiences of Science teachers regarding Spiral Progression Approach, as well as determining the views and insights of Science Teachers in relation to the implementation of Spiral Progression Approach in teaching their subject, Science teachers still have misconceptions or misinterpretations about the Spiral Progression Approach. The outcomes also confirm that despite revisions in Science Curriculum due to the implementation of Spiral Progression Approach, teachers still reveal constructive experiences. However, when unconstructive experiences steal the limelight, both students and teachers reveal struggles
Open Document