I believe that there is no right or wrong way to discipline a child, but there is a right and wrong way to behave. Some children do not need as much discipline as the next child. It is the parent’s job to access what their child needs. I believe in spanking my children in the respect I was, along with
Video games are not the source of violence but they are consistently blamed; parents need to make sure that their own children are not exposed to media hype that would be considered as violent or damaging to their own kids. The media truly believes they are the scapegoat for anything that goes wrong with today’s society. Today’s parents are naïve and ignorant to the fact that they do not know how to regulate the things their children watch and they cannot control their own kids behavior so they immediately point the blame on someone else. They need to teach their children good morals and show them how playing with guns can change their lives forever. People who own guns need to keep them put away and out of the reach of children.
There truly are times when it is best for a treatment to be either withheld or withdrawn to keep a child from going through needless suffering. It is strongly agreed that if treatment causes more harm than help, then, that treatment should be discontinued or never started. The child’s best interest should always be of priority. Nurses and physicians must consider the concepts of futility, disproportionate burden, assent, and best interest when helping parents make, possibly, one of the hardest decisions of their lives. They must work together to help parents understand the benefits of withholding or withdrawing and that they won’t be hastening their child’s death, but only making them a little more comfortable.
I want my child to respect me, not to look down on me.” Even today, we talk about each generation wanting something better for their children, but we talk less about the fear and anxiety that accompany these aspirations. In what ways do you still see evidence of parents’ anxiety regarding their children’s intellectual development and material
We must institute a relationship where it is the right of the children to alter or abolish the rules and regulations that we find offensive. We agree that insubstantial causes should not change the rules that we have been abiding by, but if our parents’ actions become excessively intolerable, it should be our right to remonstrate against such power and shut them down, to the benefit of the children. The history of our despotic parents calls for independence from such overpowering power. To prove our arguments, we submit facts to present our case:
A child should not be spanked out of anger, but out of love. Thirdly, spanking should be administered sparingly, should be done with the parent's hand, or with a specific object set aside just for spanking. Lastly, spanking should always be done in private, so the child will not be humiliated. If corporal punishment is administered in this manner, the child will benefit greatly from his or her discipline, without the effects such as depression and
I wanted what I wanted and no one was going to tell me otherwise. Most parents spank their children out of discipline because they want them to do well in life and become upstanding citizens and it is usually how they were disciplined. Spanking children should be a decision that is left up to the parents and judged by the actions of the individual child. Not every child learns from a spanking. All discipline must be consistent and tailored to that child’s current needs.
It’s funny how the two people who brought each of us into this world, same blood and genetics as us, can prohibit us from having a diverse and fun-filled life. As a child they’ve preached to us about the importance of being different; being a leader not a follower. What or who exactly would we be leading if our parents don’t give us the freedom to make mistakes or if our life is based on their perished goals. Parents believe that we shouldn’t voice our opinions towards them they consider it “talking back.” I believe that we should voice our opinions for what we believe in. They feel like we aren’t eligible to make our own decisions.
The parents need to realize that a disability is not a death sentence. As stated above, many times a disabled child has just as much an impact on a family as child prodigy and a family may also come to love this child as deeply as they would if they were a “normal” child. Genetic counselors should only be held legally responsible for a regretted decision if the parents felt like they were being persuaded into that decision. Genetic counselors should only give the parents information, both negative and positive, about the disability and nothing more. The counselors should not refer the couple to a hospital that could possibly terminate the fetus nor should they refer them to a facility that will care for the disabled fetus when he/she is born.
The doctor should a) be acting in the patient’s best interest, and b) attempt to persuade the girl to involve her parents. In exceptional cases, however, contraceptives could be prescribed without parental consent. In 1980, a British citizen, Mrs Gillick, wanted to make sure that none of her daughters would receive contraceptives under the age of 16 without her – Mrs Gillick’s – approval. The health authorities responded that they were unable to give her that assurance; after all, the decision was up to the doctor’s judgment, as described in the previously mentioned guidelines. Mrs Gillick decided to sue.