Simply a Love Story - Reading Lolita

777 Words4 Pages
Simply a Love Story Shao Siyi Lolita proves itself to be more obscure than Heart of Darkness in both language and structure, as another masterpiece of authors who learn English as their second language. The talented Russian writer, Vladimir Nabokov wrote his last novel in Russian in 1930s named The Gift. And after that, as if it was a ceremony to farewell the hometown culture, he left Berlin for America. It was when, most critics believe, that Nabokov grew into his tone of black humor which has no integrity and faith within. However, with the publication of Lolita, this black humor had evolved into a kind of melancholy with less and less disguise. He let it flow through the whole book with his most exquisite touch. And after the struggle of almost half a century, Lolita finally gain itself the reputation of one of the most valuable work in the 20th Century literature world. The first time I watched the movie Lolita (1997), I thought it was one of the funniest story I’ve ever met. However, when I picked up the book, it was almost the saddest story I’ve ever read. Different from readers of the last century, shocking, pornographic, immoral are no longer the most frequently adjectives to describe the feeling after reading the book. It would rather be beautiful, poetic and intriguing for us readers. Driven by the irresistible desire, Humbert Humbert guides us through the most innocent land of love with its filthiest means. “You have to be an artist and a madman, a creature of infinite melancholy, with a bubble of hot poison in your loins and a super-voluptuous flame permanently aglow in your subtle spine.” In his epilogue, Nabokov states that Lolita has no moral, while Humbert is the classical hero with his tragic flaw. It reminds me immediately of one of Shakespeare’s sonnets: The expense of spirit in a waste of shame / Is lust in action; and

More about Simply a Love Story - Reading Lolita

Open Document