Restricting Criminogenic Information

1215 Words5 Pages
Research Article Analysis Ronica Banks CJA 334 University of Phoenix Research Article Analysis Restricting Criminogenic Information is about limiting the First Amendment in favor on crime control. Criminogenic information is the “how-to” information that can be obtained in books and via the email on how to create bombs, grow pot, fabricating acid, etc. The problem with criminogenic information is that it is readily available through many sources and can and have been used to commit crimes. The article referenced the Caylee Anthony story of how her mother, Casey Anthony used the internet to gain instructions for how to make chloroform which was later found to play a role in killing Caylee Anthony. Casey Anthony was ultimately aquitted…show more content…
In this study the author uses an approach that should be followed with regard to “how-to” crime manuals. It is proposed that if the material serves information to its audiences about methods to committing a crime and/or methods on how not to get caught and if so, the material is lacking serious political, scientific, or literary value, then the material should be classified as criminogenic and stripped of the First Amendment protection. Inductive logic is when you begin with some data and then determine what general conclusions can be logically derived from the information. In this study the example used would be the example of the Casey Anderson case. You could conclude that Casey used the information off the internet on how to make chloroform and used it to murder her child. The finds of the study by using various cases and data are that there is a fine line when using the First Amendment and the publishing of these “how-to” books, articles, and media based publications. They can and will be published and the authors hold no control of how people interpret them and use them to commit a criminal…show more content…
citizens are entitled to there are always exemptions. This would be a case to case basis and would all depend on the circumstances of each case to discreatly say what information may have been obtained to harm someone. As far as blaming the author, we all have the right to freedom of speech but when it comes to the “how-to” manuals, there should be some type of limitations on what can be published and what can’t. We will never be able to control the many methods of communications that have been and will be sent in place for those who choose to use the internet. This information can be passed on through social websites, blogs, etc. This type of information only makes it easier for someone to harm another human being. Blaming and trying to convict the author is absurd and can be a lengthy court process trying to prove that an author meant for people to use the information to maliciously harm another individual. There’s many ways to accomplish this by using everyday things in our homes, or things that can be obtained at a local grocery store. In the essence to fight crime and deter criminals in using such information, I think starts with social rehabilitation. Getting our community and the citizens to make better choices and help those who are falling through the cracks on a road of
Open Document