On this episode of the Lego Simpsons it is more child friendly view of the spring field where everything is made by Legos. Because it is on the Lego reality theme where the characters is going to be Legos which let them do some more physical gags than they could use in a regular Simpsons episode. “This Episode of the Simpsons is funnier and humorous than ever” the producers said. The success of the Lego movie of this year makes a pre look for what it would be look like on the new episode of the Lego Simpson’s. On the trailer of this episode give us a glimpse on the new Lego Simpsons where they can do more extra ordinary thing that they can’t do on the previews episodes.
* Questions of Procedure: What should be done about it? 5. How do classical stases apply in analyzing scientific discourse? * evidential: what exists or doesn’t exist in the natural world? * Interpretive: facts are settled, but argue on what theory applies and so on * Evaluative: the significance * Methodological: procedures and techniques + what will be the outcome 6.
What are the similarities and differences between qualitative and quantitative research? Qualitative research is deals with collecting descriptive information that cannot be definitely measured on an exact scale, often things that are observed. Examples would be emotions or feelings, attitudes, behavior, etc. It is a research method for exploring issues and topics in an attempt to understand them better and obtain answers and in some cases find similarities. Qualitative research is used in business research, market research and even scientific research.
I do believe the unpleasant arousal and negative emotions would simply be temporary, if the experiment was conducted in accordance to American Psychological Association (APA) ethical guideline, and the IRB. I would judge the ethics of the study based on the way the researchers and experimenters handle the debriefing. I feel that deception, at times is a necessary tool social psychologist need to understand and generalize certain phenomena. Elm’s discusses the need for deception for increased external validity. He argues that if participants know what behaviors and emotions researchers
Though this is often difficult as social facts tend to be unnoticeable therefore sociologists must avoid being bias when developing their theories and concepts. Positivist Popper suggested in his theory of falsification that in order for something to be regarded as a valid science it must try to disprove their hypothesis. He believed that science can never have absolute truth, but the longer it can go without being falsified the truer it is. He rejects
While Ethical Naturalists believe it holds great importance as it can convey facts and help us to understand ethical theories, there are those who strongly disagree with this. For example Intuitionists, such as Moore, believe that our intuition is more useful when wanting to know how to act morally than knowing the definitions of ethical terms. Although Non-Cognitive theories disagree with the factual content of ethical statements, it is clear that they still see some significance in ethical language. However rather than seeing it as facts, they accept that morality is subjective and suggest that the importance of ethical language is provided by the emotions conveyed in the phrases used. Perhaps more so than Emotivists, Prescriptivists see ethical language as fairly meaningful.
However there are very strong weaknesses that go against his theory. It is conceivable that an intuitive conscience could be misleading and therefore seems to have a similarity to Aquinas’ more logical theory, which believes the conscience to be a device that distinguishes which acts are moral and unmoral. Also people’s ideas of morality Aquinas believed that through reason we can use the conscience as a device for distinguishing
The third part is if partially admitting guilt, will this make them feel better or worse than not admitting guilt at all. The references used span from all the way back to 1957 with Sykes and Matza’s Techniques of Neutralizations; A theory of delinquency, to 2013 with Hilbig and Hessler’s What lies beneath: How the distance between truth and lie drives dishonesty. The article writers aren’t biased in their scientific approach. They find a problem, do their research, come up with a hypothesis, and conduct studies with proper usage of the scientific
While on the surface these worldviews conflict, this paper argues that there is a role for both. The Scientific Method Distinguishing science from other ways of seeking knowledge requires focusing on the scientific method. Fundamentally, this method involves a “merger of rationalism and empiricism” as scientists collect data and test hypothesis using the data (Jackson, 2009). Generally speaking, the scientific method consists of six steps, the first of which is to identify an empirically solvable problem (Jackson, 2009). Second, conduct a literature review to gain better understanding of past research on the topic.
The traditional negotiation theory distinguishes between two negotiation styles. Positional bargaining which can be pursued in a hard or a soft manner has been complemented by the approach of principle based negotiation. In their publication "Getting to yes" Roger Fisher and William Ury proclaim being hard on the problem but soft on people to be "a method of negotiation explicitly designed to produce wise outcomes efficiently and amicably" The journal at hand deals with the question if principle based negotiation is an appropriate strategy to reach an agreement that yields promising returns for the single negotiator. My assumption is, that the approach may be too soft to maximize the negotiators outcome. Fisher and Ury recognize that "behind opposed positions lie shared and compatible interests, as well as conflicting ones".