Public Enemies Essay

2433 Words10 Pages
The 2009 historical drama Public Enemies is “number one in historical accuracy” according to the author Bryan Burrough of the book Public Enemies; having no manipulation or distortion of the truth of the period and event of America’s greatest crime wave. Burraugh congratulates Mann for achieving to stick to the facts, which I agree with. However Mann’s only fault was the lacking deliverance of Dillinger’s pre-bank robbery anecdote that shaped his character into the number one Public Enemy of America, as well as the absence of the nation’s appraisal towards him; such that “bank robbers and gangsters took on the mantle of folk hero for many desperate poor, disgruntled Americans,” according to Amy Sillup due to their blame of the banks for the Great Depression. “Dillinger was a national hero.” “second most popular man in America after president Rooselvelt,” states Mann, which the film fails to address the public’s portrayal. Mann spins a multi-layered history that documents and focuses on the seismic shifts in both crime and justice that defined the era of the establishment of a universal police force, the FBI and the rise of Mafia and gangsters during 1933-1994. Public Enemies concentrates on the relationship and battle between the criminal and FBI or Police specifically to stress the crucial attitudes and behaviours during the period of America’s greatest crime wave. Therefore overall, Public Enemies is a useful historical source for the construction of the era in the Modern world. According to Rosenstone, “films based on documentable persons or events are History as Drama” which Public Enemies is, adopting the America’s greatest Crime Wave period with the most popular and number one Public Enemy: John Dillinger’s biographical history which is based and concentrated on during the Great Depression in 1933. The context of the film dates back to the modern history
Open Document