Probation Corrections

1267 Words6 Pages
When it comes to the programs typically administered by probation departments, intensive probation supervision is noted by anybody who carries out a violation, they might be incarcerated to a prison or admitted to serve probation time by the court system. Truth of the matter is a defendant could be sentenced to a great degree of guidance through probation. IPS is an immensely disciplined order of events, and the prisoner must obey all terms of tough probation. Prisoners are under house incarceration and they are substantially watched by teams consisting of a parole officer and a surveillance officer. They monitor the prisoners by conduction of house visits four times per week for first phase offenders. Periodically surveillances might…show more content…
Some consist of monitoring for a 24 hour period, some just check in periodically. Some check without warning. Some check with a phone call. House arrest is a repercussion that will be implicated after a person has broken the law; usually it is restrained for the person who has again and again been guilty of for instance, driving while under the influence of alcohol. Offenders are recommended in wearing a device that bypasses a signal to an electronic apparatus that is being monitored also known as electronic monitoring it is used as part of their verdict and it is worn on the ankle. This monitoring unit identifies that the bracelet is not within the nominated range and it sends a call to the streamline control systems and it knows when the offender ditches his or her dwelling. Violators who constantly disobeyed the rules of the house arrest procedure will face eradication and enforcement of other retribution which may include punishment such as incarceration to a prison or to a jail (DUI/DWI Foundation, 2013). The community and the administrators and even the criminals have all substantially formed positive results from house arrest, just like other systems of legal arbitration. Relapse is greatly shortened because criminals are usually informed of what could happen with their sentence, they could have their time prison…show more content…
That is why I believe that IPS would be the best of these three options. Maintaining constant every other day contact with their parole officer would force the ex-convict to stay accountable for their actions. With electronic monitoring, the whereabouts of the ex-con are known at all times. However, they would not meet with their administrators face to face as often. This would make it easier for the ex-con to invite old influences into their lives simply by inviting them into their own homes. Also, without that more frequent face to face contact, it would be easier for an ex-con to partake in substance abuse and then cleanse their system before another meeting with their administrators. House arrest is the same way in that, yes the ex-con may be required to stay at home, but there are not as frequent meetings with their parole officer. Even though they may have to call in daily, there would be fewer face to face visits than there are with IPS. Face to face meetings with the administrators are so important because the appearance of a person can say a lot about them and how well they are doing. Also, being face to face can be of benefit because it would be easier to detect if the ex-con is lying. I believe that IPS with four times a week face to face meetings would be a more productive way of rehabilitating an ex-con. The
Open Document