The Legislative Branch’s Senate, Congress, and House of Representatives can impeach the President. Impeach means to charge a public leader with misconduct in office. This limits the Executive’s power to make decisions disapproved by the Legislative. The Senate has to approve all Presidential appointments. This means anybody appointed by the President then has to be approved by Senate.
It also means that members of Congress are not elected on a joint mandate as members of a prospective government, as would be the case in a parliamentary system, but to represent the interests of their districts and states, and on a separate mandate from the president. However it can be argued that this hinders the system as the president only has limited influence over Congress, and this creates the potential for gridlock and contributes to the weakening of parties. So if the president is a different party than Congress he has hardly any power which is concerning considering the president is head of state and should therefore have the most power. On the other hand it can be seen as a positive, since legislation is the product of compromise and consensus and it is therefore better founded than, for example, legislation whipped through the House of Commons. To conclude it helps the system in a way that it stops there being a dominance of one person or party which is good in a way that the parties have to find compromised and there want me dictatorship.
If the power wasn’t divided then there would only be the government; no President, Congress, or Supreme Court. This is how separation of powers prevents tyranny. Checks and balances prevents tyranny. According to Federalist paper #51, each branch has a strength over each other. The executive branch can nominate judges for the Supreme Court and can veto laws the Congress create.
Whilst there are operating guidelines within which the president must follow, mainly the joint co-ordination and approval of Congress, to construct and enact (Hastedt, p169, 2009) these policies, going to war being the most significant, there are a number of tactics to overcome constitutional restraint. These tactics legally permit the same course of action as heavily censored bills and acts of government but with only the president’s authority necessary for implementation. Executive Agreements carry the weight of a Senate-approved treaty but require only presidential approval. The president can bypass the need for Senate approval and its subsequent influence on policy by appointing Informal Ambassadors to negotiate the same Senatorial tasks. A president can instigate or participate in an Undeclared War by citing the need for humanitarian action.
The U.S. Senate was created by the framers of the U.S. constitution, to be a legislative body that could function over long periods of time, and focus more on the big issues that the U.S. faces. The U.S. Senate is broken, and the blame can be put on specific causes. The reasons why the Senate is broken are interest groups, filibusters, and extreme partisanship. Interest groups can control a Senator by offering their votes if he/she votes a certain way. Filibusters can bring the work of the Senate to a halt because of the lack of restrictions for debate on the floor of the Senate.
He acknowledges foreign governments, and under the advice and consent of the Senate, basically asserts these foreign governments as credible. As Chief Legislator it is the president’s job to impact the legislation that is introduced to Congress. One of the most recognizable items of business the president does as Chief Legislator is his annual State of the Union Address. I think that at this stage of Obama’s presidential
After its final pass through both houses, the bill is sent to the president. If he approves, he signs it, and the bill becomes a law. If he disapproves, he vetoes the bill by refusing to sign it and sending it back to the house of origin with his reasons for the veto. The objections are read and debated, and a roll-call vote is taken. If the bill receives less than a two-thirds vote, it is defeated and goes no further.
Although the President has the power, he generally delegates responsibilities to the Vice President as well as members of his cabinet. The other branches of government prevent the President from acting like a monarch or dictator but the President is able to sign legislation into law as well as veto it. The executive branch is held with the responsibility of enforcing the laws that are set by the legislative branch. For over a century the president of the United States has been arguably the most powerful man in the world. The legislative branch is the section of government that makes the laws for the rest of the nation.
In some states the voters themselves can take steps to unseat their governor by demanding a special ‘’recall’’ election. Some of the differences are that not every governor has a cabinet, but every state has a number of top officials who are in change of executive departments and who advise the governor on important issues. Another different is The judicial branch is the nation’s court. They oversee the court system of the United States through court cases and explain what the constitution means and explains the meaning of laws passed by congress. One of the things the state and national government have in common is that
In these cases, the bill goes to a conference committee made up of members of Congress. The conference committee works out differences between the two versions of the bill.”(Bill Becomes A Law). It is then sent to congress where the bill is reviewed in front of all members. The president then comes into contact with the bill that has passed many hands, and finally has the opportunity to make a decision on whether this bill stays or goes. If the president decides to veto the bill, the Senate and House still has the ability to overrule the president’s decision.