Was the “pat-down” of the driver legal? Yes, Officer Smith had a legal right to request the driver out of the vehicle for a pat-down. In the case of Terry v. Ohio, the Supreme Court discussed the requirement of dealing with armed and dangerous individuals. The court stated that an officer does not need probable cause to arrest in order to conduct a reasonable search for weapons as long as the suspicion is developed by factual information. In this fact pattern, Officer Smith acted on facts that a car matching the description of the automobile current pulled over of possibly being involved in a previous case involving a fellow officer murdered on the road side.
If you are riding in the car with an individual and the police pull you over is it okay for the police to arrest the passenger in the car even if he or she says that the contraband that he finds is not his? Another hypothetical question is this, Assume that police discover a crime that has been committed by one person, they go to seven people with questions about the crime, they all deny culpability, and the police already know that one of the guys is guilty. Can all six of these guys be arrested for this one crime even though police don’t really know which person is guilty? There are simple and easy answers to all of these questions : it depends if the police have “probable cause” to think that a person should be arrested and is guilty of a particular crime. That was the complicated part in the Pringle case that was brought out by the Supreme Court.
Automobile Searches: Automobile searches are considered warrantless searches. In Carroll v. United States (1925), federal agents searched a car for illegal alcohol. Because of the Carroll case, automobile searches were considered as warrantless search. Cars are obviously mobile, in which they can be driven away along with the evidence of anything illegal. If you were to get a search warrant, it will be too late.
Police Powers Stop and question It’s one of the basic powers that police have. They can stop you at any time and ask you what you are doing here and why you are in this area or where you are going to. However you don’t have to answer any of those questions. Stop and search This is one of the most important powers of the police force and those include stopping persons and vehicles if they have reasonable grounds to suspect that you are carrying for example illegal drugs, a weapon or something that could be used in committing a crime. You can also be searched without ‘reasonable grounds’ if it has been approved by a senior officer and this can happen if you’re suspected of being in a specific location or area and if you’re carrying a weapon or have used one.
If the fault is not on the police, Slager has to be punished. For now the outcome is unknown, but he will not get away. There more important question here is: “What, if there were not any video, which confirms his fault?” Close to nobody could prove that the shots were fired without any reason. The conclusion of this is: To prevent such shootings from happening more video cameras for police officers are needed. Body-mounted cameras enable the police to police themselves better.
[change tone/pace]Right now in Victoria the law states quote ‘Police and Emergency vehicles have exemptions to break rules in the case of emergencies and may act unpredictably,’ end quote. This means police cars are allowed to run red lights and pursue suspicious people; currently there are no speed restrictions on high-speed pursuits. And it is my view that it should be kept that way. If there were restrictions, the law offenders would just take advantage of this, knowing full well that the police are restricted to a certain speed. Many people would be driving as fast as the competitors in the grand prix and no one would be able to stop them.
“A formal justice system is one in which laws are set and enforced and punishments are administered by state institutions such as courts, police, judges and prisons” (Ask.) A justice system can possibly encourage deviance and crime because there are some people who do not like to follow the law. An example of this behavior can simply be driving under the influence of alcohol. In our society everyone knows that it is against the law to operate a motor vehicle in this condition but yet there are so many people still doing it. Crime will always be committed as police are not always looking over people’s shoulders to ensure people will not break the law.
It is against the law to buy marijuana or to use it, so is it wrong for one to buy it off the street as a type of cure for an illness? The patient is also a strong believer in not using drugs and has always thought that the drug dealers should be locked away in jail so they cannot help destroy lives and families, so is it right for them to go against their own beliefs and go buy it and use it ? In another situation, one sees a highway patrolman speeding excessively all the time for no reason other than they think they can because they are cops. Is it wrong for a highway patrolman to give a ticket to another driver for doing the same thing one sees the highway patrolman do each day? On the other hand, is it wrong for a driver to speed because they see a highway patrolman speeding?
This law would minimize the number of accidents that occur, I do believe. If cell phone use while operating a motor vehicle was against the law, I do believe it would only be far if the computers in a cop car should also be illegal. I say this because most of the time cops are focused on the computer and if they weren’t distracted by the computer they would also be able to prevent accidents that occur because of speeding. Another reason to adopt the law of cell phone usage while operating a motor vehicle would be because texting is against the law and we as citizens are required to follow the laws. It is overall dangerous to talk on the phone, and or text while operating a motor
While using a cell phone when driving may not be the most unsafe distraction, studies prove that it is the most common cause of car crash accident, and common cause of death in the world. The use of cell phones while driving should be banned in Philadelphia, because many people die due to distraction of cell phones. Cell phone distraction causes a