A few common unreported crimes that deal with negative sexual related criminal behavior toward another individual are visible. These are known as rape as well as sexual assault. The reasons many may feel hesitant to report crimes include fear of the accused criminal such as retaliation, shame or embarrassment of society’s judgment as well as the law enforcement not believing his or her statements. Other reasons may include courtroom participation as well as the thought of the crime being too petty to report. Although the act of negative criminal behavior from one individual to another such as rape and sexual assault is indeed underreported, there are also other crimes unreported.
Herbert informs his audience that many americans are unaware of ethnic profiling and its negative effects. I agree with herberts article that ethnic profiling is a big issue in the united states and needs to be stopped. The idea of racial profiling is completely immoral and should not be tolerated. The law promises the equality of everyone and law enforcement officals should not be allowed to practice this act. Individuals,blacks,and hispanics in this case are often profiled by law enforcement officers because there more likely to commit crimes.
Sixth principles “Police use Physical force to the extent necessary to secure observance of the law or to restore order only when the exercise of persuasion advice and warning is found to be insufficient”. A lot of police agencies get in a lot of trouble because of wrongful death or injury. You can only use deadly force when the public put the officer in danger life or harming the public. If he uses the deadly force he has to have a better reason to the chief to use that type of force. Seventh principle, “Police at all times should maintain a relationship with the public that gives realty to historic tradition that police are the public the public are police the police being only members of the public who are paid attention to duties which are incumbent on every citizen in the
Some argue that the police’s most defining feature is their capacity to use coercive force (Katz & Walker, 2008). Force may become physical, as well as the power to arrest, and the use deadly force. It is important to keep in mind that there are laws set in place to limit the amount of force an officer uses. Such laws have allowed for better policing practices and an improved police/community relationship. Although police use of excessive force still arises from time to time, the number of incidents has dropped dramatically over the years.
While others believe it is wrong and discriminatory. Racial profiling of a certain race and gender such as African American males, have an effect on society, and how society reacts to certain events. There have been events in American history that have led to riots or protests, which I believe is society’s way of fighting back. Racial profiling has been a long standing implemented tool used by law enforcement. However, it is important for law enforcement to follow guidelines and regulations such as civil rights.
Justice and law: Unit 1 Abstract assignment #1: Law enforcement Fall 2012 Use of force When is it justified? - Is there are any differences between the law enforcement agencies with regard to the question of when use of force is justified. Introduction Even though there are many different types of law enforcement agencies, their common overall goal is to ensure security and maintain law and order. The law enforcement agencies are also responsible for preventing crime and investigating offenses. Too ensure this obligation it is essential that the law enforcement agencies are authorized to use force – even deadly force.
E.g. Power may use authority to gain control and respect. I do not agree with this statement. While some obey authority out of respect, people often obey it out of fear as well. The repercussions of disobeying authority are certainly as harsh and strict as are those of disobeying power.
In addition, majority of jurisdictions consider force that can lead to serious bodily harm; for example, a bloodied head, as being equivalent to the use of a deadly weapon (Siegel & Senna, 2008). Sharon was already guilty of, aggravated assault and battery when she put her husband in fear of bodily harm. In fact, the harm does not necessarily have to happen, and the fact that it did makes it even more difficult to argue against the use of a deadly weapon (Siegel & Senna, 2008). The fact that Sharon not using a deadly weapon is not true makes this argument very
Thus, the problem of criminal gun violence is concentrated within a very small subset of gun owners, indicating that gun control aimed at the general population faces a serious needle-in-the-haystack problem.” The vast majority of citizens buying firearms are only doing it merely for their own protection. Criminals are always going to have access to firearms may it be legally or illegally. So the worst thing we could possibly do is to outlaw guns for the whole population. That would leave crime victims utterly defenseless. Gun ownership plays a big role in personal safety.
We face a problem of full accountability, many owners purchase weapons without thought of receiving training for or how to secure the weapon. It is proven that “cultural orientations condition individuals’ beliefs about risk through culturally partisan forms of trust” and that “The people they trust, naturally enough, tend to be the ones who share their worldviews” (Braman and Kahan 576). Gun owners and gun controllers continually profess to the need/no need of the weapons with the many excuses but when paired down to the most basic reasoning it is “that insufficient gun control will expose to many innocent persons to deliberate of accidental shootings; and that the excessive gun control will render too many law-abiding citizens vulnerable to the violent predations” (Braman and Kahan 577). The opposition to legalized gun owner ship responds to the claims of need with their own reasoning to remove all weapons with the exceptions of government officials by reiterating with the statement that “the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution is targeted towards