The party was not acting as a volunteer in providing this benefit. The party receiving the benefit would be unjustly enriched if allowed to retain the benefit without paying for it. All of these requirements must be met in order for a quasi-contract judgment to be awarded. In this case, I believe that the requirement most likely to be disputed is the question of whether or not Middleton benefitted. However, the requirement of enrichment could be argued as well if enrichment came from knowledge and not profit.
This practice only becomes a problem if the individual submits the work as their own. When an individual falsely submits this type of work as their own it is a violation of the rights of the original author and the individual has committed plagiarism. According to the catalog at California State University San Marcos (2008), an individual that puts their name to work that they didn’t complete, whether as an individual or as part of a group, it is plagiarism. Another type of
A tangible product must be created to warrant protection and the documentation of this idea and its execution must be clear. Copyright law exists to foster creativity and productivity and protect intellectual property, but this begins with the due diligence of the entrepreneur. Creators of new ideas cannot make assumptions about those whom they are employed, and they cannot allow their ideas to be made available to people they do not trust. It is likely that the Winklevosses did not have an idea about how popular their idea would become, and this was ultimately extremely costly for them. However, this case also clarifies how important it is to protect ideas and avoid informal work relationships with people they are not certain they can
The writer could rephrase the term ‘poor people’ as under privileged or poverty stricken. Also, rather than starting the sentence ‘and most notably’ they could have just stated ‘notably.’ The writer then goes on to express their own opinion by throwing in the question “And in fact, why would there be?” As a scholarly writer one must avoid expressing their own opinion so blatantly. As a scholarly writer one must express an original thought carefully, by synthesizing the information from multiple sources the writer can then express their opinion but constructively with supporting evidence. No one can win an argument without evidence to support it! While this may appeal to many different audiences including computer experts, people researching the ‘digital divide,’ teachers of high school students, or high school students, it’s intended audience is unclear.
Knowingly submitting another person’s work as your own, without properly citing the source of the work, is considered plagiarism. This will result in an unsatisfactory grade for the work submitted or for the entire course. It may also result in academic dismissal from the University. | | | |BTM7104-8 |Dr. Claude Superville | | | | |Statistics I |Activity 3-Normal Distribution and Probability Theory | | |
It is a defense of studying each historical period on its own terms, and not imposing one's own moral and social standards on figures and situations that existed with, perhaps, a different set of ethical and cultural concerns. Butterfield’s text described historians who project modern attitudes on to the past, pass moral judgments on historical figures, and regard history as significant only to the extent that it labored to create the modern world. Such judgments are viewed as problematic because they tempt historians not to understand the past on its own terms. Butterfield argues that historians should write aesthetically rather than polemically, exercising "imaginative sympathy" in appreciating the lost worlds of the dead rather than seeking, or expecting, the vindication of their own current positions (92). The "Whig interpretation," as Butterfield calls it, sees history as a struggle between a progression of good libertarian parties and evil reactionary forces, failing to do justice to history's true complexity.
Textbooks are not appropriate references for this purpose. Plagiarism is a form of academic dishonesty. Copying material from another source and pasting the words from that source into a paper is not acceptable. The objective of research and writing is to read source material, digest the content of that information, and then write a summary or persuasive presentation about the topic or case using the writer’s own words to support various opinions or
Textbooks are not appropriate references for this purpose. Plagiarism is a form of academic dishonesty. Copying material from another source and pasting the words from that source into a paper is not acceptable. The objective of research and writing is to read source material, digest the content of that information, and then write a summary or persuasive presentation about the topic or case using the writer’s own words to support various opinions or
Worse, is that they ignore their responsibility to the tribe that has contributed so much to their science curriculum. This could possibly taint any future studies if the university earns a reputation of not honoring commitments to its subjects. In light of the circumstances surrounding this case, there are few options besides student involvement. Without the university population taking up the case, there could be a perpetual stalemate between the university and the tribe. It falls to the students to protect the guiding principles of the university and ensure it is being held ethically
Entwistle’s examination of MacArthur’s lack of exegesis on certain passages was shocking. I could see how MacArthur forced passages to mean what he wanted them to mean, and I suspected that MacArthur himself knew this. Leading up to this chapter, I could see how this book had begun to shape my thinking in a different way. A few years ago, I would have dismissed Entwistle’s argument entirely. Now, critical thinking skills engaged, I saw where MacArthur’s presuppositions had clouded his