The current P-plate laws are extremely affective in reducing accidents on the road.This is because they deal with many of the dangers p-plate drivers face while driving, including distractions, driving speed, peer pressure and driver safety. To begin with, the current p-plate laws are affective in reducing accidents while driving because they deal with the important issue of distractions. An example of a distraction that is dealt with by the current p-plate laws is mobile phones. Mobile phones cannot be used by p-plate drivers when driving or while the car is moving or stopped but not parked. This helps to stop accidents because it removes distractions from a p-plate driver so they can focus solely on driving.
Another issue is reaction time. Many older drivers do lose reaction time, which is a potential threat to drivers and pedestrians around them. They should be tested not only to protect themselves but everyone around them. Both a road test and a knowledge test should be taken again. Also a vision and hearing test to ensure the person is qualified to drive.
The fact is that there were several cars involved which means a large number of witnesses. The reality is that more than one person saw the accident the way that it actually happened and will be able to say that Jackson is the one that caused it, not the woman. Even if this were not the case Jackson has a moral obligation to step forward and say that he caused the accident. Moral reasoning involves “reasoning from moral rules, principles, or standards and resolving conflicts among them, thereby placing limits on what one may do with a clear conscience (Barnet & Bedau 399). In other words does the decision you are making go against your own morals, principles, or standards.
A dilemma zone is defined as an area approaching the stop line within which a driver finds himself too close to stop safely and yet too far away to pass completely through the intersection at a legal speed before the red phase commences. Any decision made by the driver may lead to an accident or near accident. (International Journal of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Vol: 10 No: 03, May 10, 2010) As shown in the diagram below. 3.0 Aim The aim of this experiment is to prove or
Because of these factors, the entire case is put into jeopardy. It could be found that the officer was not lawful in his pulling the vehicle over in the first place. If that were the case, everything subsequent to that would fall under the Fruits from the Poisonous Tree Doctrine, and therefore no evidence would be admissible. However, because of the totality of circumstance, this is not the case. The totality of circumstances provides that one must look past each individual aspect of the scenario and look at the scenario as a whole.
Emma Yates UNIT 39: From Crime Scene to Court It is the job of the FSI to find and collect evidence left behind by offenders on the crime scene. Using the latest forensic techniques they look for all sorts of evidence. The FSIs follow several procedures. To stop potential evidence being destroyed, lost or contaminated they preserve and protect the crime scene. FSIs then start to work with the investigating officers.
Wrongful death is the taking of the life of an individual resulting from the willful or negligent act of another person or persons. There are several causes of wrongful death which can include automobiles, malpractice, and workplace accidents. Due to these causes of wrongful death, there are damages that are typically awarded, but there are statutes of limitations. Most damage of wrongful death are caused by automobile accidents which are called vehicular manslaughter, he or she can be charged with a misdemeanor which is a minor crime with a maximum of a year in a county jail or only a fine or a felony, punishable by a term in state prison, depending on the circumstance. Vehicular manslaughter which can be caused by gross negligence, such as driving over the speed limit, but in another instance like driving drunk could get you a felony charge.
Another main reason is that even if a person was to be texting while driving most of the time he or she will not admit to it. This would cause for less evidence in a case where someone was injured in an accident. This source would be important to me in most of my essay in most of it. It has some good facts stated by a lawyer who is involved in lawsuits relating to car wrecks while texting and driving. The source states that a person texting while driving can be following the laws while texting and driving, and another person might be the cause of the wreck.
For example, what if people chose not to stop for a red light; wouldn’t there be many car accidents and things more tragic? This is why the rights are not absolute because they are made to a point where it’s to protect the people. The constitution does give individual rights but also gives the government the rights to change it based on behavior and other factors. Mayor Buddy Dyer this is why you should agree with me. Where it says the government made certain dangerous areas off-limits, which prevented residents from accessing their homes and personal property.
Everyday simple tasks such as adjusting the radio, talking to someone else, or sending a quick text message can have deadly consequences if they are done while a person is driving. Drivers should always use caution and pay full attention to the road. They should reduce or avoid distractions in the car which interrupt careful driving. A very large number of accidents are caused by distracted driving, many of them fatal. Laws are being put into effect to penalize distracted drivers, but the drivers themselves are ultimately responsible when it comes to safety and responsibility while on the