Patriarchy Friedman

830 Words4 Pages
The society that Friedman uses as an example is a static society, never changing, content to use the same outdated processes for more modern progressive issues, and as such, interpretation is necessary. When applying outdated laws to a modern situation, Friedman is correct in most cases by saying that the interpretation becomes distorted, but most commonly observed is that it is the results that end up distorted when one applies outdated laws to modern situations. In Jewish folklore and mythology, Adam’s first wife was named Lilith. Instead of being created from Adam’s rib like Eve, Lilith was created at the same time as Adam, during Rosh Hashanah. But Lilith refused to be subservient to Adam, believing that as they were created at the same time, out of the same material (unlike Eve), they were then equals. Because of her rebellion, she was cast out of the garden, and when she tried to bear a child with the archangel Samael, God cursed her with infertility and damned her to be a demon. As the myth goes, any children she creates are demons. In the creation of Eve/womankind, it is said “This one shall be called Woman, for from Man was she…show more content…
According to all texts, a woman should let her husband rule over her, and any form of rebellion must be stifled and shut down, as seen with the reduction of the ketubah, when dealing with a “rebellious wife” (Berger 151). Yet, abortions are allowed, practically left up to the decision of the mother, as well as divorce, an act championed by Maimonides, who was by all accounts a misogynist (Segal 74, Berger 6). After all interpretation is said and done, what Judaism is left with is a strangely distorted feminist/misogynist culture, one in which abortion has basically been legal for centuries, and at the same time, in most of Orthodox Judaism, women are not even allowed to read from the

More about Patriarchy Friedman

Open Document