Outline and Evaluate Cultural Variations in Attachment

302 Words2 Pages
Outline (AO1) Van Izjendoorn and Kroonenberg (1998) carried out a meta-analysis of this findings from 32 studies of attachment behaviour, adding to 2000 strange situations in 8 different countries. They found that variation of attachment types was Salk between countries and that secure attachment was the most common classification. Insecure avoidant was generally the next most common, apart from in Israel and Japan where insecure resistant was the most popular. They also found that variation within the cultures was 1.4 times greater than the variation between cultures. Therefore, the conclusions of their study was that most infants are similar to the USA, where secure attachment was the most common type. Evaluate (AO2) The strange situation is not a good tool for measuring attachment types outside of the USA because there are differences in child rearing practises access countries shown by Grossman and Grossman (1991) where they found that more German infants were classified as insecure avoidant rather than secure, this was because in Germany, children are taught to be independent from an early age. Furthermore, the strange situation is unethical as infants are not protected from harm, especially with insecure resistant infants who are rarely separated from their mother. This is supported my Takahashi (1990) where most infants were found to be insecure residents as the moths are reluctant to leave their children, so much so that these infants had to be removed from the study as they were becoming so distressed. Therefore, the strange situation is not a suitable way to measure differences in attachment types because of these different in child rearing practises, resulting in low ecological validity as children are not usually placed in a strange room to be distressed in real life, so they may present behaviours of an attachment type that they are
Open Document