CVS Caremark is designing a global expansion strategy to target areas that are profitable and promising demographically. CVS Caremark will select United Kingdom as a country to enter and establish a solid relationship. Background of company and of country CVS Pharmacy was established over 40 years ago in 1963 in Lowell, Massachusetts by Sid Goldstein, Stanley Goldstein and Ralph Hoagland and originally sold health and beauty products. The corporation headquarters is currently in Woonsocket, Rhode Island and employs over 200,000 as of December 2012. In the last 40 years CVS has experienced tremendous growth.
Other problems include the company having a lackadaisical business strategy, internal conflicts among upper management, an information technology department that has not been well run and is frequently criticized by peer executives, and a lack of integrated business objectives that do not align with information technology objectives, the inability to prioritize projects due to unclear business objectives. This has resulted in project failure, a bad company reputation, loss of market share, and stock price tumbling. Carlisle believes that IZL Corporation is salvageable, but needs to upper management to do this. In this paper, the problem, recommended and alternative solutions, as well as implementation strategies are discussed. Key Issues The key issues for Jack Carlisle, according to Robert Austin, are recorded in the informally published manuscript, Jack Carlisle, CIO.
There was a lack of proper supply -chain command. Unlike earlier, when DynaCorp was smaller, the manufacturing and engineering teams worked in symphony and harmony with each other. Now due to offices being separated across geographies there is a lack of communication between these teams. Another aspect is that new ideas were not reflected anywhere. This is due to the many layers of the organization.
Description of OldPharma Let’s assume our client is OldPharma, a major pharmaceutical company (pharmaco) with USD 10 billion a year in revenues. Its corporate headquarters and primary research and development (R&D) centers are in Germany, with regional sales offices worldwide. OldPharma has a long, successful tradition in researching, developing, and selling “small molecule” drugs. This class of drugs represents the vast majority of drugs today, including aspirin and most blood-pressure or cholesterol medications.OldPharma is interested in entering a new, rapidly growing segment of drugs called “biologicals.” These are often proteins or other large, complex molecules that can treat conditions not addressable by traditional drugs. Biological R&D is vastly different from small molecule R&D.
Case: The New Director of Human Resource 1. After investigation of Mount Ridge Engineering’s corporate human resource structure and plant operation procedures, in my opinion currently the relationships between human resource policies and actual plant operations are very weak. Although we can say that the human resource department has established a fairly complete set of procedures and policies, the actual implementation of the policies at plant level operations do not seem to be thorough enough, no employee implement those rules. Especially, the staffing function is very weak. There is no proper linkage between corporate HR structure and operations at the plant level.
Explain why the case writers assert that the "areas of relative strength" of this option rank as "High", "High", and "Low". The case writer believes that as a team, the ERP system vendor and the business development manager had a high level of expertise in software development and application domain. However, the case writer ranked local company knowledge as low because the PowerIT staff with the local knowledge of the company’s processes failed to participate in the project in a meaningful way. As a new hire in PowerIT, the business development manager possessed limited knowledge of the company’s processes. Therefore, the project leadership, the BD manager and vendor, lacked the necessary local company knowledge.
There are not enough regulations and monitoring system for the daily accounting activities. For instance, management and auditors spend very little time reviewing the insignificance of petty cash account. So the five elements of internal control is not work well in this company. The control environment was not effective; there was no effective risk management, which helped the company to realize its objectives; control activities and monitoring are lack. Moreover, the CEO is ultimately responsible for the internal control who assumes primary responsibility for the system of internal control.
The IT team had the business team so confused during the meeting that they eventually just tuned out and IT never actually got to talking about how the new technology could be used for marketing and why it was a good idea. The next issue is the lack of integration between IT and business. Not only do they have problems communicating the points they are trying to get across in language that can be easily understood, but the business end feels as though IT does not know how to meet their goals. A good example of this is on page 76 where it is discussed that “IT people don’t even know some of our basic business functions” and “We don’t feel IT is contributing to creating new business value for Hefty.” Lastly it seems as though there is bad time management and planning on the IT end. I cannot be too harsh on this considering that many projects do not go as planned, on schedule or on budget but this did raise a red flag in the mini case.
The SWOT analysis for the Meditech is shown in Figure1. Meditech has focused its efforts in advancing in products development when production orders have increased at a rate that hasn’t become compatible with production schedule, distribution & delivery services. Customers grew unsatisfied with the inefficient system of distribution & delivery. Figure 1: SWOT Analysis Operations organization structure The entire operation organization was reporting to the V.P of operations. This structure has hindered communication hence flow of information between main operations department that were dependent on one another.
Any objectives agreed upon by a management coalition would inevitably be highly ambiguous goals, enfeebling the ability of a top manager or entrepreneur to truly control the direction of the firm. Cyert and March argued that while ‘individuals have goals; collectivities of people do not’ (1992, p.30), and thus the firm could not have well-defined objectives. Premised on this weak (or the absence of) leadership, The Behavioral Theory posits that the firm’s strategies and learning processes are short-term in focus with adaptations induced by crises. Management is unable to reconfigure internal resources because of the immutability of standard operating procedures and the ambiguity of coalition goals. In his discussion of firm strategy, Oliver Williamson notes that in Cyert and March ‘the firm resembles a fire department more than a strategic actor’ (1999, p. 14).