Nature vs. Nurture

1262 Words6 Pages
Nature vs. Nurture: What Makes You, YOU? There have always been questions about human nauture. Why humans are humans and why they are the way they are? What makes them think and what creates their personality? Why are some people highly intelligent and others appear to lack common sense? For years psychologists have been debating if your genetics or your surroundings are more important to determine personalities ( ). Some psychologists strongly believe that genetics have fairly little to do with peoples personalities but rather it is our surroundings, culture, and traditions that shape who we are. According to Saul McLeod, author of "Nature Nurture in Psychology" from Simply Psychology, "At the other end of the spectrum are the environmentalists – also known as empiricists (not to be confused with the other empirical / scientific approach). Their basic assumption is that at birth the human mind is a tabula rasa (a blank slate) and that this is gradually “filled” as a result of experience." Other people for nurture believe our childhood and experiences are the only thing that determines how well each individual deals with social situations. In the article "Taking the 'vs.' out of nature vs. nurture" the author, Alana Snibbe, states how culture is a big part of nurture and who we are. Culture is humans way of answering life's unanswerable questions and it's this that shapes a lot about how we think and our individual psychology. People who believe in the same things are probably going to think alike and act alike. Obviously, there are some very extreme cases where nature is taken out of the debate all together and nurture is the sole factor to why someone behaves the way they do. Some examples are an abusive parent, being abandoned or neglected and always being in someone's shadow. These situations have a much bigger effect on humans than any

More about Nature vs. Nurture

Open Document