* A)Fact, Definition, Cause, Value, Policy * B) Support, Questions, Warrants, Characteristic, Argument * C)Proof, Argument, Cause, Policy, Support * D)Questions, Definition, Warrants, Proof, Fact 3. What are claims about value? * A) Claims made of what something worth * B) Argue that one person caused another thing to occur * C) What the definition of something is a settled fact * D) Argue against a certain policy approach to a problem 4. What is Claims of Definition? * A) Definition help categorize your topic * B) value involve judgments, appraisals and evaluations * C) State or assert that something is the case * D) the regard that something is held to deserve 5.
Examine the premises; do they contain fallacies? If so, where is the faulty reasoning? if you are unsure of the name of the fallacy, explain why you think the example you cite is a fallacy – that is, what is the faulty reasoning, or the unsound argument, or the misleading argument or statement? 4. Is this an argument from pathos, ethos or logos?
Major errors; difficult to follow; descriptions of calculations are not included. Calculations are incomplete Calculations missing Well written. Questions are answered correctly in clear, complete sentences as part of the overall discussion. Reasonably well written, but contains typos, is missing a discussion point, or a minor error. Questions are answered numerically, not as part of the overall discussion.
3. What parts do they contain? - a. Premise: a proposition which gives reasons, grounds, or evidence for accepting some other proposition, called the conclusion. - b.
Little or no attempt is made to frame the discussion, and paragraphs lack development and internal coherence. | Argument’s path of development is unclear, disjointed, or unfocused. Transitions are absent or unclear. Introductory and concluding paragraphs do not adequately frame the discussion. Body paragraphs lack development and internal coherence and may only be loosely related to each other.
2. The importance of a purpose statement. 3. How the research questions and a hypothesis are developed. 4.
In the first half of the year earnings for the Resources division have increased, due to higher export coal prices. * Operating in many different geographical areas * Being dependent on customers and supplier chains in each local and overseas areas, as well as different geographical areas of operations. This increases inherent risk due to difficulty to control operation in different locations as well as the climate changes in regards to their products. II. Unusual pressure on management The management is under unusual pressure to perform well and increase returns for shareholders in order to gain more remuneration: * Objective to provide a satisfactory return to shareholders, this would increase inherent risk due to pressure placed on management in order to meet budgets or forecasts * Remuneration plans * Also the directors have significant remuneration plans – they are awarded a lot of
(Scientific, Practical, Social, Survey, Experimental, Historical, case study, job analysis, develpmental, trend, correlational studies )? Are the Limitations and
i. Improvement can not be made in what your attempting to accomplish. ii. Changes or corrections will always be questioned and resisted. C. Defensiveness and credibility.
The lack of randomization, manipulation, and control factors make it difficult to establish cause-and-effect relationships with any degree of confidence. The statistical techniques used to compare groups in a causal-comparative research include