Mlb Bargaining Essay

443 Words2 Pages
3. What “weapons” does the union have at its disposal in the 2006 contract negotiations? The main “weapon” the Major League Baseball Players Association (MLBPA) has in contract negotiations is the fact that they represent the players. Without the players, many people are out of a job. Similar to a solo singer with a spectacularly talented band, if the singer doesn’t show up for the show, people are going home. If the band doesn’t show up, the singer sings acappella and instantly turns the show into an “unplugged/acoustic” event. From concessions to groundskeepers to ticket takers, a Major League Baseball game does not take place without the support of many departments. When the 2006 contract negotiations were about to begin, the MLBPA knew that they could not be as firm on demands as they were in the past due to the fact that they did not want to get involved in future labor strikes or lockouts. The MLBPA did, however, want to ensure that the players they represent were being treated fairly, particularly those that were not the “star” players. One of the ways the MLBPA could help with bridging the salary gap was to increase the minimum salary for players in an effort to make it fairer to new or not as recognized players. 4. What is the distinction between “distributive bargaining” and “integrative bargaining”? Apply concepts related to each type of bargaining to this case. According to negotiations.com, distributive bargaining is known as the “fixed pie” because there is a “limit or finite amount in the thing being distributed or divided amongst the people involved.” This type of negotiating generally involves parties that do not have a previous business relationship. Clearly not the case with Major League Baseball (MLB) and the MLBPA as they have been doing business together since 1953. The one element prior to the 2006 negotiations,
Open Document