Mary Anne Warren's Arguments Against Abortion

1257 Words6 Pages
Abortion Is abortion murder? What about in times where rape is involved with conception? Who is held accountable for the child? These are just a few of the numerous questions asked when dealing with the heated debate over abortion. There are many viewpoints on the topic, pro-life and pro-choice, and sometimes people will disagree with others in their own category. Judith Jarvis Thomson assumes, in her essay A Defense of Abortion, that a fetus is a human being from the moment of conception. She does not state she believes this, but uses it as a premise for her argument on why and when abortion should be permitted. She uses analogies to illustrate why, in times of rape and failed contraception, abortion should be allowed. Mary Anne Warren, in her essay On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion, talks about one of Thomson’s analogies and refutes it. Warren believes that banning abortion would be unconstitutional, but disagrees with some of Thomson’s ideas on responsibility. Is Warrens discontent with Thomson grounded? Judith Thomson argues that an abortion is…show more content…
She again uses an analogy to make her point. Say you are on the brink of death and your only savior is Henry Fonda and the touch of his hands upon your head. There are no rights involved with Henry Fonda touching your head. You have no right to be giving Henry Fonda’s touch, just as the violinist has no right to keep you strapped next to him for any period of time. The Fonda scenario also helps the people-seed argument by saying that the seeds have no right to your home, you tried to prevent them from taking root there. You had no control over the condom breaking, you are not responsible for the life of the child. Thomson strongly believes that abortion is allowable in these two situations and also that opponents “right to life” argument is an invalid one that must be

More about Mary Anne Warren's Arguments Against Abortion

Open Document