Macbeth Figrutive Language

2901 Words12 Pages
Keith Waddington Michael Brian Eng 320 Oct. 18 1993

Bits of Macbeth: Figurative Language1
Paradox
We might begin our brief examination of figurative language in Macbeth by focusing upon paradox: firstly because it is given additional weight of purpose by merit of its inaugural position, but also because the paradox is perhaps the most exigent of figurative devices, challenging the reader to participate creatively in an effort make sense. Not only is paradox the first figurative device to be introduced, as we initially encounter the weird sisters, but the device is practised twice within the space of only a few lines: firstly there is the battle “ . . . lost and won,” (37) to be followed shortly by the famous “Fair is foul and foul is fair.” (37) Here, particularly in the latter oxymoronic example, we see acutely the power of the paradox, forcing us to seek a context in which the contradiction does not contradict. The repeated use of paradox throughout Macbeth suggests that there is something in the device itself which seemed wholly appropriate to the content of the play: the paradox presents something which is not, says something which it does not say, concealing the truth from the superficial glance. Accordingly the paradox in itself, aside from what it might

1This

is a major rewrite. All sections have been either corrected,

expanded or replaced in there entirety.

K. Waddington 2 eventually render as the true meaning, underlines the deceptiveness of appearances. The theme of appearances is of course central to Macbeth, and is manifested not only in the recurring use of paradox, but also in the used clothes imagery—the masquerade of Macbeth—Lady Macbeth’s interest in appearances—the sleeping and the dead as pictures—the supernatural vision to name only a few. But it is the answer to the “Foul is fair” paradox that points forward, like a witch

More about Macbeth Figrutive Language

Open Document