A collaborative strategy occurs when either party shows extremely high concern for their own outcomes as well as the other party. This integrative approach involves detailed problem solving throughout the negotiation. Both sides want the maximum benefit to be mutual satisfying. A competitive strategy occurs when one of the two parties pursue their own objectives very strongly. They have little interest in the second party getting their way and no concern for maintaing a good relationship.
A good boss truly understands that unless the job is done, and done by all, they have not done their job. A good boss is someone who becomes a mentor of their employees. This is a skill and trait that businesses are looking for in bosses, but all the good ones have. They grow and develop their team to the best that they can be. Since communication skills are at an all-time low, a boss who can communicate is a gem.
It is not difficult to notice that today’s generation faces with some very serious issues. One of them is that there is a dilemma about the lack of effective leadership. The reason why we have such challenges in today’s world is due to the ineffective leadership. People who have power and influence on making decisions often are concerned with self-service and preoccupation of power instead of being concerned with other people’s welfare. However, there is stil no compromise on which qualities make a person a good leader or how someone can develop himself as a good leader if he is not one.
Another myth he busted was of him having the title of being a leader. In all actuality, his followers are just as much leaders as he is. He encourages creative thinking and is more of a supporter of new ideas than a creator of them. Also, just because he is a leader does not mean that coercion, manipulation has to take place in order for duties to be executed. He is a very relaxed and laid back individual who does not have regular board meetings or a huge corporation whereas many organizations do.
These employees are effective followers who typically have experienced setbacks or obstacles. These followers are capable, but often tend to be cynical who are able to think independently, but do not participate in developing solutions to deficiencies they see. A typical alienated follower would be an employee who has worked with the organization for many years, they understand the job and have the knowledge to complete all the task needed. However, if there was a shortage of inventory these employees would rather complain about their supervisor not filling the order correctly in stead of finding the solution to the problem. The conformist participates actively and has a good relationship with the boss.
Leadership styles in particular can have a major influence on how individuals behave and how it effect decisions made in groups for example. Autocratic leadership . The effect of this is that it often creates for an unpleasant experience; group members give less effort into completing functions to the best possible outcome In addition the leadership style of Democratic leadership has been found to be the most effective, the influence it has is the leader reserve the right to make final decisions but encourage feedback, ideas, and suggestions from all members of the group usually leaving members feeling satisfied. And lastly is
This factor is the team leaders’ behavior and style of management in each of these teams. The team leader or manager being a main role player in both teams has shaped the performance and motivation level of the team members and has led Lumen to be a successful and lively team, while the Absorb to a directionless and aimless team. The absorb team’s some members had also been together in a team previously, but there is no such an indication that they had underperformed in their previous teams, while now they are finding their team leader an authoritarian leader who instead of encouraging their hearts is looking by himself as what is right and what is wrong. He seems to be applying the Old management model which is to get things done in his own way rather than letting his team choose the way they do things, so that they feel motivated doing it. Let us look at the definition of team to understand if they were team in its modern sense of meaning.
Leaders that use the collective-participative style encourage their subordinates to give good ideas and strong knowledgeable advice to come up with a stellar decision. Strengths of the Collective-Participative Decision Making Style Advantages of the collective-participative decision making style include group participation and involvement. This decision style promotes team work and positive involvement from employees. The collective-participative decision making style gives not only the leader a chance to voice his or her opinion but all of the staff as well, and this promotes a healthy organization because the knowledge and experience within the company or organization could be effectively used to make decisions. This style of decision making usually leaves the employee feeling fulfilled because he or she had a chance to give their perceptions and ideas in the process.
Workers were rewarded and recognized for individual, team and plant performance, which allowed for consistent motivation to work hard. Because workers felt they were a part of the decision making of the plant, they had higher stakes in the performance of the plant as well. 2. Fenway Partners, as defined by Group Theory, is a set of businessmen that share a conventional and bureaucratic style of management and decision making. This style of management is the group norm and allows the members to be a cohesive and stable group.
During the communication style profile assessment, my work ethics proved to be completely opposite of what I am in my personal daily life. The results came out to be that I have a directive personality in the work environment. As a director, I am often very decisive, frank, blunt, very formal, competitive, and that I like to take charge and control over things at work. Often people view me as having no sense of humor and that I’m usually the one that people often don’t get along with because of my aggressive nature and diplomatic ways. As being a director which I think best describes me at work, helps earns me the respect that I need as a manager.