Leeper Lingerie Company

967 Words4 Pages
Leeper Lingerie Company Assignment #3 Sabrina Wingard Professor John Muehl Total Rewards – HRM 533 November 10, 2011 Do you think that Keith was justified in insisting that the job, not the person be evaluated? Explain your answer. I absolutely think that Keith was justified in insisting that the job, not the person be evaluated. As his job title states that he is the chairperson of the company’s job evaluation committee, which simply means that his main focus is to evaluate the job itself and not the character of the person with the job. Per an article on slideshare.net (n.d.), a job evaluation is where you thoroughly analyze and assess different jobs and their worth to an organization. Then, evaluated and placed in an order of importance to the organization. Job evaluations have nothing to do with job performance or any type of assessments relative to performance. For this reason alone, when Bob interrupted, saying, “I suggest we start with Geneva” and Keith replying with, “Bob, we are not here to evaluate Geneva. Her supervisor does that at performance-appraisal time. We’re meeting to evaluate jobs based on job content. In order to do this fairly, with regard to other jobs in this company, we must leave personalities out of our evaluation, was very professional and accurate because the objective of the meeting was to evaluate the job itself and to set a standard for the organization. Evaluating Gevena’s performance as a receptionist may not deserve the same pay as another receptionist with the same company, which is why job evaluations are done separately from performance evaluations. Not all people perform the same in the same position within an organization. Do you believe that there is a maximum rate of pay for every job in the organization, regardless of how well the job is being performed? Justify your position. In my opinion, I

More about Leeper Lingerie Company

Open Document