Lear vs Oedipus

297 Words2 Pages
Lear vs. Oedipus Blindness is one similarity between Lear and Oedipus. Even though Lear wasn’t physically blind he couldn’t differentiate between genuineness and cunning. He couldn’t see that his two oldest daughters were deceiving him and Cordelia loved him most. [“For we Have no such daughter. Nor shall ever see That face of her again. Therefore be gone Without our grace, our love, our benison.” (Act I, Sc I, Ln 265-267) ]. He proved his blindness again when Kent posed as one of his servants after being banished from the kingdom. Lear begins to regain his vision by realizing his oldest daughters are conniving and wicked after they lock him out during a horrible storm. He realized Cordelia’s wasn’t a flatterer and her love was so genuinely strong words could not express it. Oedipus had both a physical and mental blindness. When he addressed the people assuring them he would find Laius’ killer not knowing he was the killer all along until Teiresias [blind prophet] says it. Details about his birth are revealed during an argument with an older prophet. At the end of the play he gauged out his eyes to show that he was and forever will be blind to the world. “O dread fate for men to see, O most dreadful that I have met my eyes.” Oedipus, gauged out his eyes because he had seen the truth and it was too much to bear and see. Even though Lear and Oedipus have authority of their kingdoms they seem very naive. I find it interesting that men of such power are unable to tell others are misleading them. How is this so? I believe had they really opened their eyes and listened to those around them sooner their fate would have been

More about Lear vs Oedipus

Open Document