Koito Case Essay

1090 Words5 Pages
Question 3 case Koito. Beside board representation, T. Boone Pickens demanded higher dividend payouts . Were his demands justified? Provide quantitative evidence to back your answer. Is there anything in the Japanese commercial code that would allow Pickens to try to get more dividends? If yes, why doesn’t he use this? If not, based on your experience as an international investment banker, what changes would you recommend him to purpose? Pickens demanded higher dividend payouts in 1989 after he bought the shares. When he bought the shares, we can assume given his status that he knew about the corporate culture in Japan: that is, contrary to US in which most managers would maintain dividends even if they have to lay off a number of employees, in Japan, managers tend to believe that executives should maintain stable employment even if they must reduce dividends (Allen, Zhao, 2007). The American corporate governance culture is more shareholders focused while in Japan they favor stakeholder as a whole. The quotes from the meeting between Mr Pickens and Mr Matsuura epitomize well this difference. In order to see if his demand for higher dividend was justified, we should first investigate the evolution of the financial situation of Koito and the pay-out policy of Koito. Graph 3.1 Evolution of the Dividend Yield. From the graph 3.1, we can observe that the dividend yield (Dividend/Share Price) decreased sharply between 1982 and 1989. That is, the dividends did not increase as quickly as the stock price. However, this is justified by the fact that the earnings per share remained quite stable, while the stock price was increasing. This would justify the decreasing dividend yield. However, in order to determine whether or not Koito is paying too low dividends, we should analyze how the amount of dividend per shares has moved in comparison to the earnings per

More about Koito Case Essay

Open Document