The listener should say what they are feeling only if it is beneficial to the relationship or to the person seeking help. When a listener displays this quality of being genuine it is most likely the seeker will become congruent as they have probably spent along time denying their feelings or not been allowed to say what they are feeling, to be congruent is to take responsibility acknowledge your feelings beware of them, then start to deal with stuff. Unconditional positive regard is respecting the help seeker as a unique being or anyone for that matter, to my believe, accepting them for who they are, this does not mean we have to agree with peoples behaviour or agree to their believes, just to accept the person; is being non-judgemental. Along with the show of genuineness and unconditional positive regard from the listener the seeker will feel comfortable within themselves, develop trust in the relationship and begin to open up, explore and start to move forward. The third quality required within this relationship is to be able to Empathise this is not to be confused with sympathy or pity, which would be to show sorrow or sadness, this would not help the seeker to progress and move on.
Discussion of issues reflects adequate critical thinking and analytical skill. Discussion/analysis makes some of the recommendations called for by the case issues. Recommendations are supported by data from some of the relevant case facts and exhibits data. Discussion and recommendations are generally presented clearly, logically, and succinctly but with some occasional lapses in clarity or with grammatical or other errors. Discussion/analysis generally reflects adequate understanding of principles presented in course readings/materials.
You would have to rely on the patient giving you the information for it not is socially desirable or have demand characteristics. On the other hand, it is better than individual differences as people may have the same thought patterns and processes. You can only obtain this information by self reports, which would probably give both of those issues; social desirability and demand characteristics. These would affect your results and therefore they would not be reliable or valid. If you were using the cognitive approach you would only get qualitative data which could be a problem as not everyone interprets the same answer in the same way.
To do so, examine Ott’s facts carefully, and locate cases with similar or comparable facts where IIED was an issue. Cite each of the four cases, using proper citation format and summarizing why each case is
Building a positive regard with your client however, goes beyond your own personal beliefs. It extends to your ability to observe, listen and detect relevant information and apply that to your work with the client. For example there would be no benefit in using a script which either the client cannot identify with at a personal level or which uses in imagery something which the client has a fear or phobia of such as an escalator. This
Analyze the Rhetoric Parts of an Argument to Consider * Identify the situation. * Identify the writer’s purpose. * Identify the major claim and supporting claims. * Identify the audience. Appeals to Logos = Appeal to reason * Consistency of argument * Clarity in asserting a thesis or point * Quality of reasons/evidence used in support of the point Appeals to Ethos = Appeal to Ethos by presenting writer as credible, knowledgeable, and trustworthy * Do your homework: know your subject.
It varies from place to place. Humans are humans, and so we should view things the same. But there are outside influences in cultures that make us see the discussed views differently. There is no truth in defining what is just and unjust but we are persuaded by believing what is in our morals by following the evidence, logic and reasoning behind each argument made. The author says “and one ought to bring up the question whether it is those who are sane or those who are demented who speak at the right moment”.
Purpose of the text (expository, argumentative, entertainment, informative) Provide support for your answer. (2 points) 6. Find 4 important statements from the
Read on-level text orally with accuracy, appropriate rate, and expression on successive readings. c. Use context to confirm or self-correct word recognition and understanding, rereading as necessary. Strand : Writing Domain : Text Types and Purposes Standard: 2. Write informative/explanatory texts in which they name a topic, supply some facts about the topic, and provide some sense of
The difference is that compliance is when someone conforms out loud with the views or behaviour but secretly disagrees. In this situation their personal views on the subject do not change. An example of compliance is not stating your own opinion on a subject, because the majority has stated a different opinion leading you to agree with them. Whereas in internalisation, a person is so persuaded by the argument that their opinions begin to change both publically and privately. People internalise the views of others when they are persuaded/convinced the arguments make sense.