Joseph Mountain Analysis

1192 Words5 Pages
Born into slavery Joseph Mountain had a daily struggle fitting into society. He served as a house servant for Samuel Mifflin until the age of seventeen. Unlike most masters during that time Mifflin taught his slaves the fundamentals in life. He taught young Joseph the Presbyterian faith and also how to read and write. Joseph would eventually use his skills as evil as he applied them to his life of crime. When he was seventeen years old, Mifflin granted him permission to board the ship to sail across the Atlantic to Europe. Soon after he landed in Europe Mountain left the ship and begin roaming the streets of London. Mountain had a difficult time blending in with the other citizens of London, until the day he met two highway men Hyde…show more content…
When he first arrived in America Mountain was caught stealing five dollars from the cabin where he was staying. For his petty crime of robbery, he was punished with being whipped ten times across the back. He then decided to relocate back to New York and during his journey he came across two white women. According to the author, Mountain approached both women violently. He attempts to grab the older sister, and she fought with him to get away from his grip he then proceeds to the other sister attacking her and throwing her onto the ground and begins raping her. Being a man of color talking to a white woman could be one the worst crimes any African American male could commit back in 17th century. Since he did not write his own confession, the validity of the story is questionable. It is very possible that the author could have made up his own version on what happened on that fateful day. Although the confession of Joseph Mountain sounds convincing if the reader were to examine the confession through a critical lens on the unfair treatment of African Americans judicially, Joseph Mountain life history and the authorship of the confession one would come to the conclusion that Joseph Mountain was…show more content…
In no instance has any fact been substantially altered, or in the lease exaggerated” (p. 301) this is one of the many statements that leaves the reader with suspicion. This obvious statement depicts that it is indeed altered and exaggerated to the greatest sense. If every word in Mountains confession claimed to have came out of his mouth there would not be any transformations from first to the third person in his narrative autobiography, “We were on the spot at the hour agreed upon, and disguised ourselves for the adventure. Hyde and Wilson were dressed in white frocks and boots… Mountain was dressed in the same manner, with the addition of a large tail wig, white gloves and a black mask over his face” (p. 290) the transformation of narration is constant throughout the confession. Just by giving a few examples one could speculate that the confession isn’t valid and is influenced by the author’s voice. Joseph Mountain was indeed a criminal but to call him a rapist is false. The fact that Joseph was an African American gave society to the right to call him a rapist and execute him just because he tried to talk to two white women. What else is known is that since he has a history of pretty crime this makes the story stick to some readers but I have debunked the accusation. It is clear that

More about Joseph Mountain Analysis

Open Document