Is Cloning Human Ethical?

932 Words4 Pages
As knowledge expands at a rapid rate within the biotechnology field, the question of cloning humans is no longer centered on possibility, but rather the ethical debate and concerns. Cultural and social factors such as media, movies, and television influence certain perceptions and emotions about cloning. The exact definition of human cloning varies with different groups and organizations. From one perspective human cloning may be defined as the production of genetically identical organisms. The scientific process involved requires that one takes an egg and removes the nucleus that contains DNA genes. Then they take DNA from an adult cell and place it in the egg. The adult cell is merged with the enucleated egg, or by a sophisticated nuclear transfer. Then the egg is stimulated electrically or chemically reconstructed and try to make it to divide and become an embryo. This method to produce offspring with identical genes with that of the parent can be reffered to as reproductive cloning. A broader view of cloning includes the production of tissues and organs by increasing cell or tissue cultures through the use of stem cells. When an egg or ovum is fertilized and begins dividing, stem cells are all alike. As cells divide, some cells differentiate and become stem cells that produce specific tissues and then organs. This process is called therapeutic cloning. (Enescu) The prospect of human cloning brings many benefits to society. In fact, therapeutic cloning is already legalized in various places around the world, including some states within the United States, Britain, and Australia. According to Murnaghan, "A major benefit of therapeutic cloning is that the cells removed are pluripotent. Pluripotent Cells can give rise to all cells in the body with the exception of the embryo. This means that pluripotent cells can potentially treat diseases in any body organ or
Open Document