Ilm 3.13 Essay

1434 Words6 Pages
M3.13 AC 1.1 Identify own learning style(s) and the learning style(s) of another member of the team. From various available assessment tools to identify learning styles I’ve chose to use Honey & Mumford Model and Kolb’s Experimental Model to identify correct learning style. Honey and Mumford Questionnaire : Accordingly to Honey & Mumford questionnaire Krzysztof represent very strong Activist preference combined with strong preference in Theorist and Pragmatist model of learning . Accordingly to Honey & Mumford questionnaire Matt represent strong Activist preference combined with moderate Reflector and Pragmatist learning preference . As a conclusion of Honey Mumford test both participants represent high Activist preference furthermore any planned personal developments should include experimental activities rather than lectures. Secondly I’ve used Kolb’s test to reduce potential risk of misunderstand questions in first test due to both participants non being native English speakers. Both percipients in Kolb’s test1 determinate very high Doing – Feeling preferred learning style furthermore both participants accordingly to Kob’s outlines prefer Active, experimentation and experience based tuitions. Utilizing Honey and Mumford’s Learning Styles Questionnaire and Kolb’s Test, individual scores have confirmed preferred learning styles of participants , both Krzysztof and Matt have a strong skill in active learning style combined with experimentation and experience based tuitions. AC 1.2 Use a simple technique for identifying own development needs and the development needs of another member of the team To identify developments needs I can use number of ways, such as interview , feedback from customers and colleagues , by observing work taking place, during annual appraisal interview, or by SWOT analyze. As SWOT analyze is a
Open Document