How Far Do You Agree That 'the Pardoner' Is More Corrupt Than the Summoner

1409 Words6 Pages
How far do you agree that ‘the Pardoner’ is more corrupt than ‘the Sumonour’, who Kirkham and Allen have described as two “unashamedly corrupt servants of the Church”? The Pardoner is represented as quite crude, ostentatious, and physically ugly but extremely well good in his labour. This is incredibly similar to the Sumonour as he is seen as repulsive, greedy and corrupt but very wealthy. The fact that they both look hideous makes it harder to define which is the more corrupt character and Chaucer uses this to his advantage, making the reader delve deeper into the Canterbury tales to work out who is the worse figure. Both the characters are portrayed as being greedy and selfish people, especially the Pardoner. Selling pardons was seen as one of the most bitterly criticised religious practices in the fourteenth century. By selling the pardons he is effectively building up a bank balance against his sins spiritually. For the sins to still be forgiven, he would have had to go and confess to a priest. Even though he gets “moore moneye than that the person gat in monthes tweye” he still lies about his relics to receive even more money. The lies are so ridiculous that people actually believe him, especially the poor; he says that “For in his male he hadde a pilwe-beer, which that he seyde was Oure Lady veil” and he also “hadde a crois of latoun ful of stons, and in a glas he hadde pigges bones”. His constant lies are insulting towards the reader as they can see he is relying on the poor to buy his stories so that he can earn money. His “bretful of pardoun, comen from Rome al hoot” hints that he could be doing dodgy deals, highlighting his corruption in society. As the Host requests for the Pardoner to tell a story, he replies, saying that “I wol bothe drinke, and eten of a cake.” He wants food before the story. This shows he is selfish as he will only satisfy himself
Open Document