The basic principle of communism is that it depends on the government’s control of industry while Fascism is based on the pride of the society and on violence to create the ideal society through the eyes of the leader. There is a difference in the two governmental styles with regards to social structure. In a true communistic society, there are no social classes, because there is a command economy which deletes the use of a social structure. All citizens are equal and share everything. In a society where Fascism is used, there are very pronounced social classes mainly because everyone has a specific role.
The biggest difference between communism and democracy lies in their economic systems . In the system of communism production and distribution of goods and resources is completely controlled by the government and is shared by the society equally. It is not so in case of democracy where these things can be owned by individual citizens. Community has the main control over resources and goods to prohibit the rise of a single person or group over the others. Democracy allows for free enterprise and accordingly the economic status of people may vary in a country from very rich to poor.
The World State, however, restricts viviparous births and brainwashes society into thinking that mothers are vile. The government in the novel controls every aspect of society through cloning individuals and conditioning them to accept the government’s ideals and their forced role in society. In the World State, the government controls the economy. The United States, however, holds a capitalistic economy. Although the government has some say in the American economy, it is different from that in the World State because primarily citizens and private companies control the U.S. economy.
Examples like “Examination day” supports this because the government stays in power by having strict laws which limit citizens intelligence. The Giver supports the claim because the government limits citizens knowledge by wiping memories and limiting their emotions. “Harrison Bergeron” supports the claim because the government there controls society through strict rules which limit uniqueness so they are “average”. With all this evidence and analysis we will ask this question, do people really want a government that controls society and do the horrible things stated above or should our goal be to help citizens and have a government that doesn’t restrict
These Guardians would practice self-selection of successors and would appear at the top of Plato’s ideal societal class, thus creating an aura of untouchable supremacy. In western democratic society today, many citizens would refute this Platonic ideal by stating that democracy is the best form of government. However, when Plato considers a democracy he focuses his attention towards the citizens of a democracy, referring to them as ‘drones’. He exclaims that the, “drones [of the democratic society] buzz with unnecessary appetites, and desires” and suggests that, “the worst among these drones soon become leaders” (18L). This statement is a rather generalized one; to consider that all citizens in a democracy live off desires is foolish.
To kill people who have killed someone close to simply to continue the cycle of violence, it destroys the avenger as well as the defender. 5. The justice system is so poor rendering the death penalty even to those innocent people; it
King's opinion on civil disobedience. Patrick is anxiously waiting on the facts and then is attempting to skip right into direct action. Organizations such as Win Without War carefully plan their protests to not only get their point across but do it in a justified way that gets the public on their side. The overall goal in Dr. King's mind is to nonviolently protest an unjust law and let the surrounding people realize what's going on and why things need to change. Patricks method not only runs the risk of stirring up a violent situation, but by intervening on somebodys everyday routine you are negatively being viewed by society therefore no one wants to support your cause.
They live in extreme poverty, mixed with corruption, greed and betrayal. They trust no one. In Juarez, Hell is real and fearless demons prowl the streets destroying anyone that stands in their way. The cartels, police and army openly slaughter, torture, rape and kidnap inhabitants as if human life has no meaning. Its inconceivable to imagine that this mayhem is linked to the global economy as Juarez
The Highwaymen were the scandalous criminals that patrolled the highways and traffic roads to scavenge for useful goods. “With the use of the Hydrogen Bomb, the Christian era was dead, and with it must die the tradition of the good Samaritan” (page 84). After the many atomic bombs destroyed Orlando and other major cities, the survivors went against each other and become either hostile criminals or bystanders trying yo avoid to confliction. “Some nations and some people melt in the heat of crisis and come apart like fat in the pan” (page 132). The villainous Highwaymen, drug addicts, and gangsters all came apart at the seams when their lifestyles changed for the worse.
As with genocide, terrorism does not create any moral dilemma to the society that implements it, yet the one that it is being used against is of the opinion that it is one of the worst things that can be used. The United States condemns all of the Muslim extremist organizations for their use of terrorism, yet the United States used the same tactics during the Revolutionary war. The exploits of the fictitious character Robin Hood used what would be seen as terrorist acts against a portion of the society in which he lived in, yet it is glorified in movies and books. Pirates also used and continue to use terrorism today. In the United States and England, English pirates that terrorized other nations are glorified, while all other pirates are