If we take to violence we will not be able to reach God after we die, unless we repent. Some chief exponents of non-violence are Mahavir Jaina, Gautam Buddha, Ashok and Mahatma Gandhi were the chief exponents of non-violence.Mahavir Jain and his followers were strictly no-violent. They were wearing thin pieces of cloth on their nostrils to filter air to breathe in. Because they feared that worms might get into their bodies and die. Still to this day, the jainas follows the same principle.
Mohandas Gandhi drew his inspirations from Henry David Thoreau; the author of “On the duty of Civil Disobedience” who is known as the founder of one of the powerful weapon known as Civil Disobedience. Therefore, he acted in a way that has not been seen before in the world. He responded to the British rule through Civil Disobedience. Putting everything together Mohandas Gandhi created his own concept of civil disobedience which is known as “satyagraha.” Satyagraha comes from Sanskrit meaning “truth force.” Indians were not allowed from the British to collect or sell salt. So he organized a campaign through satyagraha.
Essay comparing essay (Mao and Gandhi) Both Mao and Gandhi were the key leaders in each of their countries, China and India. The means they adopted in order to alter each of their government’s regimes, which are rotten to the core, was totally different, even though they desired to occur quite similar things. The attempts they tried to carry out were various, such as economical, social and political reason. As following evidence shows. Firstly, in order to acquire the power economically, Gandhi utilized a spinning wheel and the traditional clothes of India to address their citizens not to purchase western clothes, which greatly contributes to Britain economy.
His goal was for the people of India not to buy salt from the British. Another one of Gandhi’s great accomplishment was when he led India to independence from Great Britain. Gandhi proved that you could get results by staying non-violent. Martin Luther King Jr., can be best described as a brave, brilliant, nice, caring, strong, thoughtful, loving, and a peaceful man. Much like Gandhi he was a strong believer in the
The march consisted of about two-hundred miles and started in Ashram Ahmadabad and ended at the Arabian Sea. They marched to boycott the ridiculous taxing on salt. "After a 24-hour long march to the Indian Ocean, Gandhi picked up a few pieces of salt - a signal to the rest of the sub-continent to do the same" (The 1930 Salt March). Well over fifty-thousand Indians were arrested and taken to jail due to all the salt laws they broke with civil disobedience. Absolutely nothing was changed directly after the Salt March but it proved that the key to Independence was to be peaceful with the use of non-violence.
Gandhi saw this as a central importance and it ultimately guided him to create a non-violent way of fighting back against the British. Tolerance of other beliefs and religions was of supreme importance to Gandhi. In his view, “The golden rule of conduct...is mutual toleration.” He believed that every religion deserves equal respect, and no religion should claim to be superior, as he thought that all of them contained the same fundamental truths. From these beliefs Gandhi came to the conclusion that Hindus and Muslims should be tolerant of each other so that all Indians could unite. Another long term factor which contributes to Gandhi’s identity is his experiences in South Africa which fostered his interest in injustice and ways to achieve it.
Although the author was working as a police officer for the British Emperor, he strongly opposed the idea of Imperialism. His opposition is expressed throughout the story. I had already made up my mind that imperialism was an evil thing and the sooner I checked up my job and got out of it the better. Theoretically- and secretly, of course- I was all for the Burmese and all against their oppressors, the British.
Gandhi was a man that would “strain every nerve to make Truth and Non-violence accepted in all our national activities” (i.e. Gandhi, 358). He believed that if India could get out of control and show the world that progress could be made, he would show other nations that they too, could gain their own power as a self governed nation. Gandhi and Marx would agree on terms of having self governing nations because Marx’s main goal was Communism. While Marx thought that strength in numbers mattered and how many Proletariats could take down the Bourgeois class, Gandhi believed that “strength does not come from physical capacity” (i.e.
Both Judaism and Hinduism have main teachings that every follower should know and live by. Beginning with Hinduism, we are aware that it is not an organized religion which focuses on a single systematic approach. Neither do they follow a simple set of rules like the Ten Commandments. Despite all of this, they still share a common understanding in a supreme being and all hold fast to concepts including Truth, dharma, and karma. “What a Hindu does is more important than what a Hindu believes.
Hinduism is not an organized religion, and it also doesn't have specials rules like Catholics with the 10 commandments. The duty of a religion is to guide humanity to uphold certain noble principles in order to lead a peaceful life and to maintain human dignity. The main goal of this religion is to become dharma: Dharma means to have some sort of right conduct, righteousness, moral laws, and duty that leads you to an eternal life in heaven. You can become Dharma by doing specific actions or using your thoughts to move you up the caste system to the highest achievement which is Dharma. All human beings in Buddhist eyes are equal, and Buddhist concepts recognize that everyone is built with dignity and the equal and basic rights of all human beings.