Similar to the ideal of our Nation, to increase education and accessibility to all, for our country is better when more people get degrees as our company is. To have any real sustainability as a company, education is a primary factor in the success, not just for the elite few, but also for the masses. The introduction of increased benefits in the tuition reimbursement program will send a significant message of respect and caring to employees. The application of the program will show benefits daily. What better to invest in
The same kind of support should be provided that led to the discovery of the internet. Free higher education will give our society a better chance. For example “Education is the key role to the long-term health and prosperity of Canada, this will lead to an improved overall economic strength of our country” (Elizabeth Hubley) Post-secondary education should be free because not everyone has the luxury to pay for tuition, so they’re forced directly into a full-time job. Also education is a key role to be in the running for a decent job. The cost of higher education puts up a major barrier for young people, where, instead encouragement should be provided, for the development of our
Tuition reimbursement means increased morale, productivity, confidence, retention, profits, and less employee turnover. Many people want to take the step to further their education and are afraid because of the financial stressors however with tuition reimbursement from employers the stressors are eliminated. Tuition reimbursement is a necessary investment toward the sustainability of the company’s present and
I have four requirements that need to be met including, 3.0 GPA or higher, 18 or higher on the ACT, 95% attendance, and a high school diploma. I support free community college because it gives opportunities, it can lower the unemployment rate, and save money. Free community college can give opportunities to lower class people who can’t afford college. If these people want to go to college, but they can’t, now they would be able to. They would be able to receive an education to help them get a job and make money.
Murray and Ungar Synthesis In the many recent debates about how to approach higher education, one issue that has constantly appears is the question of students benefiting from a liberal arts based education. Some argue that a liberal arts education is helpful in teaching students the basic life skills, others claim that a more specific field of study is necessary in order to b successful in life. In Ungar’s essay “the New Liberal Arts”, he claims that with a liberal arts education, students can benefit tremendously when they receive their jobs. In Murray’s essay “Are Too Many People Going to College”, he proclaims that a liberal arts degree is not highly recommended because the more difficult careers want students to take classes that are more specific to a job. Sanford J. Ungar and Charles Murray both conduct and display their own opinion towards the facts they learned through their own strenuous research.
This would significantly increase the pollution. The increase in pollution would then cause the government more money into the health care sector, as more people would now suffer from diseases such as asthma and lung cancer. It would also affect students, seniors and people who work low-income jobs[2]. For these people the TTC is usually their only means of transportation, which would disrupt the way they do simple tasks such as going to school. Some people would argue on the hand that if Toronto did not have the TTC, then the
Protect environment is one of the major project to government. How lucky the children live in Canada. Then the completed systems will help parents to raise kids. In Canada, people usually said the government own the kids. Why?
The Canadian Government positions should be elected by the people in Canada because it would prevent many problems by the members in the Canadian Government. People all believe that to have their own opinion is a great advantage but not all people have the time to do background research on the Candidates. By having the people of Canada vote for who they want would than restrict partridge from happening behind the scenes. Voting for our own leader in the senate would than help everyone in a great way. This would become easier on our daily lives.
The author argues from a unique point of view that educational loans hold out freshly graduated students from boosting the economy by contributing to other economic sectors such as invest in homes and pay for vocational trips (Applebaum 2). The greatest stumbling block that is caused by educational loans is the limitation that they create on the purchasing power by the student graduates. In actual sense, lazy loan holders calling for free handouts should think of forgiving the educational loan as a scheme of economic growth stimulus initiative and not a call. Not even the new “pay as you earn” initiative is likely to solve the economic situation, at least not for private educational loans (Applebaum 4). Federal loaners may benefit from the new initiative, but, private educational loan holders will continue being burdened with the loans that continue to accumulate serious interest rates with each passing day.
For instance, they would get a good job if you had a profession. That case it would be easier to get a job. Also, they will have a higher salary compared to other countries. Furthermore, USA’s salary is higher than other countries so that you will have a better economic future. For example, save money for retirement and your job.