Feminism - Audre Lorde, Peggy Mcintosh, Betty Frie

483 Words2 Pages
This paper will address the writings of Audre Lorde - “The Master’s Tools Will Never Dismantle the Master’s House”, Betty Friedan - “Feminine Mystique” and Peggy McIntosh “Unpacking the invisible Knapsack”. Audre Lorde’s piece deals with the role of difference within the lives of American women. Bringing out race, sexuality, class, and age. She emphasizes that without these considerations any feminist debate of the personal and the political is deteriorated. Betty Friedan conducted a survey among suburban women in the United States in 1950s and early 1960s and wrote about what she called "the problem that has no name". Her findings reveled a vast number of unhappy housewives despite the life in the suburbs with financial security with husband and children. Peggy McIntosh, explores male and white privilege, emphasizing that she has “often noticed men’s unwillingness to grant that they are over privileged, even though they may grant that women are disadvantaged.” The piece encourages white people to become aware of their own privilege and in doing so make white readers more accountable for the social privileges. McIntosh takes a positive approach to inequality, by focusing on what could be changed and by whom as oppose to the standard focus on the deprived/oppressed group. Another approach to her writings can be taken. Could Peggy McIntosh be elevating the “privileged ” even more by placing the focus on them? In Audre Lorde’s, the most powerful argument made, was differences can promote healthy debate and lead to a harmonious interdependency; the path to freedom. In Friedan’s piece she focuses solely on the plight of middle - class white women, and does not give enough attention to the differing situations encountered by women in less stable economic situations, women of other races or sexuality. Could Friedan’s studies be viewed as

More about Feminism - Audre Lorde, Peggy Mcintosh, Betty Frie

Open Document