Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close

521 Words3 Pages
Close and Alone Thesis: In Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close, Jonathan Safran Foer uses the symbolism of the key, flashbacks, and foreshadowing to show that traumatic events can have extreme negative effects on a family. Within the novel Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close, Oskar Schell’s father has died in the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center on 9/11. Oskar now lives with his mother who, after about a year has begun to get involved with another man and Oskar does not know how to react to this. Oskar does not really interact well with people and needs to see a psychiatrist for post traumatic stress. Oskar was able to say “nothing” to his father before he died, figuratively and literally (14). This literal sense of Oskar not saying anything can represent a missed opportunity to say ‘I love you’ to his father. This may have had an extreme effect on Oskar because it’s the last time that he saw his father, and he didn’t say that he loved him. Oskar’s grandmother has made a point to tell Oskar that “it’s always necessary” to tell people what you truly want to say (314). Oskar has taken this information and interpreted it as telling people everything that you want to say, and giving them everything that you want to give them. At the beginning of the novel, Oskar is describing the ride to his father’s funeral with his mother and his grandmother, and mentions the “bracelet that [he] made for [his mother]” and that she was wearing it and that made him “feel like one hundred dollars” (7). Oskar uses expressions like this throughout the novel to describe his feelings about things. Later on in the novel, Oskar’s grandmother mentions a bracelet that her grandfather bought for her, and that it “was supposed to be a symbol of his love,” and it was showing that his love for her was bigger than she was, because the bracelet “ was too big for [her] … [and she]

More about Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close

Open Document