Explain How a Follower of Natural Law Would Approach the Issue of Abortion

510 Words3 Pages
Natural Law is a normative ethical theory and is considered to be a Christian ethic as it roots from the scriptures. This theory was put forward by Aristotle, based his theory of the efficient and final cause, and was championed by Aquinas in the 13th Century. It is a deontological theory that looks solely at the action, irrespective of the consequences therefore if an action is good, but the consequence is bad, Aquinas would deem this to be good.. Aquinas based his Natural Law theory on four words, "do good, avoid evil" and attempted to answer two questions; What is one's purpose? and What are we designed for?. It is also a deductive theory as the 5 primary precepts can be deduced to form secondary precepts such as do not abort. To answer these questions Aquinas devised 5 primary precepts. These were considered to be a set of moral laws for all of society to follow and to live by. The primary precepts are; protect and preserve innocent life; keep an ordered society; worship God; and to educate those who need it. These precepts were formed because Aquinas believed that they would help us reach our final telos, or purpose. He believed that this was to "do good and avoid evil". This theory is applicable to everyone as the primary precepts tend to be the foundations of every society, culture or religion. If one were to apply this theory to the modern day issue of abortion, we would see that there is many reason for a follower of Natural Law to believe that abortion is very wrong. Firstly, by abortion we mean the termination of a pregnancy by artificial means therefore meaning a procured abortion. An abortion is an induced termination of a pregnancy to deliberately destroy a fetus. As a Christian theory, a follower of Natural Law might believe that the fetus becomes a human at the moment of conception. This would then highlight that abortion would be considered
Open Document