Evaluate the Marxist Claim That the Family Exists to Support the Continuation of the Capitalist System.

734 Words3 Pages
Sociology homework- Essay In this essay, I am going to be evaluating the Marxist claim that the family exists to support the continuation of the capitalist system. Marxism is a structural, social conflict theory. A social conflict theory is one that believes in a major conflict between two groups in society. The Marxist view, is that the ruling class (Bourgeoisie) exploit the working class (Proletariat) for profits. This is the opposite of functionalism, a structural consensus theory, which believes that society is based on agreement and it functions properly. One Marxist theory is that of Engels. His theory is based on Primogeniture. This idea is based on the fact that, many decades ago, people would pass down their power and wealth to their children. This ensured that none of the wealth, nor power, went to the working classes. This also ensured that large companies or people with large amounts of wealth, credited this to their bloodline only. However, a criticism of this theory, is that there is simply no evidence of this. Engels looked at societies a long time ago, meaning there is no hard evidence of Primogeniture. However, Engels’ theory supports the question, as it shows that people would do anything to ensure their wealth and power went to their children after their death. Another Marxist theory is that of Althusser. His theory is based on the Ideological State Apparatus. This is the theory, that the family is a tool, a tool to transmit bourgeoisie-corrupted values, which helps to ensure the family creates an efficient workforce, one that willingly obeys to any form of authority. However, this is contradicted by the theory of Lasch and Donzelot, the idea of fragmentation. This theory said that the ruling class fragmented families, and made sure that they couldn’t group together and possibly form a revolution. However, Althusser’s theory supports
Open Document