They both studied different ideas, and preached different views about how our mind functioned. While Maslow focused on the humanistic aspect of our personality, Jung focused on the psychoanalytic aspect. However, they were both inspired by two great people. Carl Jung was deeply influenced by Sigmund Freud who happens to be the father of psychoanalysis. Though he dismissed Freudian theory that stated that human personality was defined by their sexual drive and desires, he established that we have 2 states of unconscious.
The LP is task oriented, logical and very much process oriented. The LP prefers learning experiences that are straightforward and detailed and learns well by the task rather than being told. LP’s will typically need a good deal of justification if the training requires much in the way of change. The LP may resist training if it requires them to expand their boundaries into uncomfortable areas without specific training and processes being put into place to assimilate it. The learning key for the LP is to give specific, clear instructions, clear expectations and support.
The norms, that society creates, may interfere with a person’s idea of “ideal self,” which may inhibit the development of social bonding. The interference of social bonding can be exceedingly detrimental to one’s growth, especially regarding to the early years on life. The psychosocial development theory was created by the theorist Erik Erikson. Erik Erikson had a very strong background in psychoanalytic, which makes him one of the most recognizable theorists. At age 25, Erikson gathered a certificate in education from the Vienna Psychoanalytic Society.
Erik Erikson Today, the American psychoanalyst, Erik Erikson is best known as the “Architect of Identity, and the “Father of Psychosocial Development”. Erikson is a Freudian ego-psychologist, meaning that he accepts Freud’s ideas as basically correct, although he has been known to look farther into the culture, and society-oriented parts (Beoree, 1997). Maybe that is why Erikson’s theories are popular among Freudian’s and non-Freudian’s alike. He is credited for widening the scope of psychoanalytic theory to take greater account of social, cultural, and other environment factors (Slater, 2002). Erik Erikson was born on June 15, 1902 in Frankfurt, Germany.
The difference Jung has with Freud’s theory of infantile sexuality and libido. Jung refused to accept that sexual instinct is the main psychological drive which led him to develop his own theory and therefore his own school of analytic psychology. The two characteristics of these theories I agree with are Alder’s four types of people and dream interpretation aided the treatment of patients. The two that I disagree with are Jung’s analytic psychology and Displacement is one of many defense mechanisms which are when a person is upset or angry with someone else and when he or she comes around other people they are still upset taking their anger out on people that had nothing to do with why she or he is
I am believe the key of an idea in Erikson’s theory is that the individual faces a conflict at each stage, which may or may not resolved within that stage. I shall now present a brief sketch of those parts of Erikson’s theory of developmental stage and on each stage on will use some question on it. Erik Erikson’s Stages of Development Stages of Development Erikson was a psychologist who did most of his work in the post-Freudian era, in the 1930s to the 1950s. He was a one of Freud student, and was the greatly influenced. However, not like his predecessor, Erikson have a great deal of importance to the social environment in a person’s.
Erik Erikson (1950, 1963) does not talk about psychosexual Stages, he discusses psychosocial stages. His ideas though were greatly influenced by Freud, going along with Freud’s (1923) theory regarding the structure and topography of personality. However, whereas Freud was an id psychologist, Erikson was an ego psychologist. He emphasized the role of culture and society and the conflicts that can take place within the ego itself, whereas Freud emphasized the conflict between the id and the superego. According to Erikson, the ego develops as it successfully resolves crises that are distinctly social in nature.
The Psychoanalysis Perspective Abstract. Sigmund Freud, the Father of Personality Psychology, highlights many theories in his writings. Most noted in this paper was the Psychoanalytic Perspective, which gives an in-depth view of determinism, the importance of conflict, early experience, infantile sexuality, and most illustrious the importance of unconscious motivation. This theory assumed that there exist three levels of consciousness in which the human mind functions. People did not come to accept his theory at first, but after much testing it was proven mostly valid and reliable.
The Psychoanalytic Approach to Psychology Angela Agcaoili PSY/250 March 27, 2012 Tracy A. Keaton, MS, LPC, NCC The Psychoanalytic Approach to Psychology While Sigmund Freud, Alfred Adler, and Carl Jung may not be the forefathers of psychology, their theories are still very well-known and discussed among current students of the field, psychologists and even laymen. Their contributions to the field of psychology, especially the psychology of personality, are innumerable, and while we have learned much more and some of their views have been disproven, they have taught us much about the field. Some of their theories are similar and there are also some obvious differences. Carl Jung was a fan of Sigmund Freud and sent him a copy of his book in 1906. After this, the two men became close friends and studied and worked together for several years.
Parson understood this when he developed the theory known as Primary Socialisation, which indicated that the fundamental role of the family was to mould the character of the offspring (Van Krieken, Habibis, Smith, Hutchins, Haralambos & Holborn, 2010). Numerous studies have been conducted worldwide reviewing the potential correlation between parenting styles and bullying (Kipp & Shaffer, 2010). The results are conclusive. Aggressive parents raise children with ‘bully’ tendencies; while overly sympathetic parents tend to instill the ‘victim’ mentality in their children (Berdondini & Liefooghe, 2005). Such statistics reveal the familial roots behind bullying.