Erdrich Pros And Cons

272 Words2 Pages
The New York Time posted a conversation between two columnists, David Brooks and Gail Collins. Brooks and Collins discuss about the performance of Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich at a debate in Florida, and predict who will win the upcoming presidential election based on evaluation of their past and current achievement. In this conversation, both of Brooks and Collins talk about their interpretation and opinions about the debate between Romney and Gingrich on Jan 23, 2012, which has happened before. According to Everything’s an Argument (Lunsford and Ruszkiewicz, 2011), forensic arguments is defined as “Debates about what has happened in the past” (P. 16) and aim to support the author’s point of argument. For example, to support the opinion

More about Erdrich Pros And Cons

Open Document