Electronic Surveillance of Employees

1065 Words5 Pages
Electronic Surveillance of Employees Professor Eric Baime, JD MBA Law, Ethics, and Corporate Governance October 24, 2010 Abstract Employees should expect privacy to complete personal needs. Employers are within their rights to use electronic surveillance to insure a safe and honest working environment. This paper will discuss whether it makes a difference if an employee is in an open area or in an enclosed office. Also, the report will determine the employer’s need to know whether or not an employee is being honest is a sufficient grounds for utilizing an electronic surveillance system. The extent to what an employer can engage in electronic surveillance of employees will be examined. Finally, this report will explore to what extent the inclusion of innocent, unaware third parties in such surveillance is legal. Employers and employees should maintain a reasonable level of respect for each other’s rights. Explain where an employee can reasonably expect to have privacy in the workplace The two places an employee can expect to find solitary at their place of employment is the bathroom and the locker room. “Employees have a reasonable expectation of privacy in restrooms and in locker rooms. In most states it is illegal to monitor employees while they are in the restroom or locker rooms because of activities that are carried out in these places are things that are not normally done in public.” (http://ezinearticles.com/?We-See-What-You-Do,-We-Hear-What-You-Say--Employee-Privacy-in-the-workplace&id=672734) They are personal acts, and the worker has a reasonable hope of solitude during these actions. Explain whether it makes a difference if an employee is in an open area or in an enclosed office There is little difference noted between open areas with a cubicle vs. an enclosed office if an employer has a surveillance system in place.

More about Electronic Surveillance of Employees

Open Document